Details

Comparison of average glandular dose in mammography for patients with breast implants when using automatic or manual exposure technique
ID Šimunović, Anja (Author), ID Alukić, Erna (Author), ID Jurša, Laura (Author), ID Marolt-Mušič, Maja (Author), ID Mekiš, Nejc (Author)

URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(25)00530-3/fulltext This link opens in a new window
.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (613,71 KB)
MD5: E4018B69B8881D819A387EF40623270E

Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the average glandular dose (AGD) in mammography screening of women with breast implants and to compare the AGD and image quality obtained with automatic exposure control (AEC) versus manual exposure settings with standard and Eklund techniques (implant displacement). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 536 patients with breast implants from a national screening program using mammography equipment from a single vendor (Hologic Selenia Dimensions) was performed. Each patient underwent eight images; four standard (CC, MLO) and four Eklund (CCID, MLOID) projections. Exposure pa rameters, breast thickness, compression force and AGD were assessed. A subset of 35 patients (eight images each) who underwent two consecutive mammograms with different exposure settings (AEC and manual) underwent image quality assessment using a standardized PGMI classification, which was evaluated by three radiologists experienced in mammography reporting. Results: AGD was significantly higher with AEC in standard projections (CC, MLO), but lower in Eklund pro jections (CCID, MLOID) than with manual exposure (p < 0.001). Manual exposure settings resulted in better image quality in standard projections, while no significant differences were observed in CCID images. For four out of six quality criteria, MLOID images were superior to manual settings. Conclusion: AEC leads to lower AGD in implant displacement projections, but increases AGD in standard pro jections. Manual exposure settings resulted in better image quality for CC, MLO and MLOID projections, while IQ was at an acceptable level even when using AEC. The results emphasize that standard projection mammography in patients with breast implants should be performed with manual exposure settings, while ID projections should be performed with AEC while maintaining sufficient IQ.

Language:English
Keywords:mammography with breast implant, Eklund technique, image quality, radiation dose
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2025
Year:2025
Number of pages:6 str.
Numbering:Vol. 193, art. 112444
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-176666 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-073:618.19-006-07
ISSN on article:1872-7727
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112444 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:250533379 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:08.12.2025
Views:62
Downloads:16
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:European journal of radiology
Publisher:Elsevier Science
ISSN:1872-7727
COBISS.SI-ID:23232005 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back