Details

Does repeated darting of lions affect their habitat selection and tourist-viewing opportunities?
ID Branch, Douglas (Author), ID Curk, Teja (Author), ID Portas, Ruben (Author), ID Cloete, Claudine (Author), ID Melzheimer, Joerg (Author), ID Aschenborn, Ortwin (Author), ID Krofel, Miha (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,65 MB)
MD5: 4131D435EE5CEACEC2DB776D23742F53
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425006092 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Increasing numbers of animals are captured every year for the deployment of bio-loggers to collect data for scientific research. This usually requires immobilisation and handling by researchers, sometimes repeatedly on the same individuals, and has the potential to change the spatial behaviour of captured animals, such as avoiding humans and human infrastructure. This is especially relevant for species like lions (Panthera leo), which are among the most studied carnivores and at the same time globally one of the most sought-after species for wildlife-viewing tourism. Here, we used habitat-selection functions to examine habitat selection of lions after being chemically immobilised, some of them repeatedly, by darting from a car. Our study focused on the central part of the Etosha National Park, Namibia, a protected area with a large, but spatially and temporally regulated tourist presence. We found that captured lions did not avoid tourist camps, roads or waterholes, despite high numbers of tourists at these sites. Lions also did not change their habitat selection in relation to tourist infrastructure dependent on how many times they were darted (once vs twice) nor with time since darting. Our study indicated that in a protected area with strictly controlled tourist movements (restriction to tourist roads and daytime periods), tourism has a minimal impact on the movement of lions. Furthermore, repeated darting and chemical immobilisation did not seem to reduce lion-viewing possibilities for tourists during our study. These findings are crucial for shaping more effective policy, research and visitor management strategies. Implementing similar measures in other protected areas such as a zero-tolerance policy for off-road driving and restricting tourist activity to daytime hours (i.e. when carnivores are less active) can help minimize the effects of tourism on wildlife.

Language:English
Keywords:lions, Panthera leo, tourism, wildlife viewing, habitat selection, chemical immobilisation
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:12 str.
Numbering:Vol. 65, art. e04007
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-176664 This link opens in a new window
UDC:599.742.711.1:591.522
ISSN on article:2351-9894
DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e04007 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:260386819 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:08.12.2025
Views:407
Downloads:194
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Global ecology and conservation
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:2351-9894
COBISS.SI-ID:520381209 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:levi, Panthera leo, turizem, opazovanje živali, izbira habitata, uspavanje

Projects

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J1-50013
Name:ExtremePredator: Odkrivanje ekološke vloge vrhovnih plenilcev v ekstremnih okoljih

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Name:Razvojni sklad UL

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back