Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Risk prioritization from the crowd-shipping provider's perspective using the CIMAS method
ID
Švadlenka, Libor
(
Author
),
ID
Bajec, Patricija
(
Author
),
ID
Pivtorak, Halyna
(
Author
),
ID
Bošković, Sara
(
Author
),
ID
Jovčić, Stefan
(
Author
),
ID
Dobrodolac, Momčilo
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(402,89 KB)
MD5: AD0ECE2CD3ED12520355DE2F3B5F8A52
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://sems-journal.org/index.php/sems/article/view/30
Image galllery
Abstract
Crowd-shipping presents a new trend in shipment distribution. It is a process in which the crowd is employed to deliver the items. Effective risk prioritization is essential in city logistics and delivery, especially with the emergence of crowd-shipping. As crowd-shipping platforms grow, they bring uncertainties and challenges that can significantly impact operational efficiency and customer confidence. Emphasizing risk prioritization is crucial for many reasons, including trust and security, improving operational efficiency, and ensuring regulatory readiness. Risk prioritization is more than a mere formality; it is a vital element in successfully managing the intricacies of crowd-shipping. By methodically addressing and mitigating risks, providers can strengthen their operational capabilities, foster better customer connections, and ultimately promote the sustainable advancement of crowd-shipping services. This paper prioritizes the risks in crowd-shipping from the crowd-shipping provider’s perspective, using a multi-criteria decision-making approach, such as the new criteria importance assessment (CIMAS) method. The risks are prioritized in descending order. Comparative analysis with the best worst method indicates the high reliability of the results obtained by the CIMAS method.
Language:
English
Keywords:
multi-criteria decision-making
,
criteria importance assessment
,
best worst method
,
risk assessment
,
crowd-shipping
,
transportation engineering
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FPP - Faculty of Maritime Studies and Transport
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
Str. 234-246
Numbering:
Vol. 2, iss. 1
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-176625
UDC:
656.073
ISSN on article:
3009-3309
DOI:
10.31181/sems21202430s
COBISS.SI-ID:
221402115
Publication date in RUL:
05.12.2025
Views:
509
Downloads:
192
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Spectrum of engineering and management sciences
Shortened title:
Spectr. eng. manag. sci.
Publisher:
Scientific Oasis
ISSN:
3009-3309
COBISS.SI-ID:
221386755
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
večkriterijsko odločanje
,
metoda CIMAS
,
dostava paketov
,
ocena tveganja
Projects
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
HE
Project number:
101101923
Name:
MSCA4Ukraine
Acronym:
MSCA4Ukraine
Funder:
EC - European Commission
Funding programme:
ERDF
Project number:
CZ.02.01.01/00/23_021/0008402
Name:
Multi-sector and Interdisciplinary Cooperation in Research and Development of Communication, Information and Detection Technologies for Control and Signalling Systems
Acronym:
CIDET
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back