A systematic framework for assessing the temporally variable protective capacity of nature-based solutions against natural hazards

Kuschel, Erik (author), Obriejetan, Michael (author), Kuzmanić, Tamara (author), Mikoš, Matjaž (author), Seifert, Lukas (author), Conevski, Slaven (author), Wirth, Maria (author), Canga, Eriona (author), Fernandes, Sérgio (author), Huebl, Johannes (author), Stangl, Rosemarie (author)

Natural hazards pose an increasing threat to infrastructures, lives, and livelihoods in alpine regions due to climate change and the growing demand for settlement space. While grey protective structures are commonly deployed to provide immediate safety, their sustainability, and thus protective function, is limited by cost-intensive maintenance. Nature-based solutions (NbS) can alleviate these shortcomings by offering cost-effective, adaptive protection that strengthens over time, making their deployment a key factor in building resilience to climate-induced hazards. This paper introduces a systematic methodology for the strategic deployment of NbS to enhance climate resilience. It integrates a three-level hazard classification system with an expert-led assessment rating 74 NbS against 29 hazards. A subsequent Principal Component Analysis (PCA) synthesises these into six functional groupings based on their shared mitigation characteristics. The core of this framework introduces two key innovations: a novel Mitigation Score and a Hazard Mitigation Profile. Together, they evaluate NbS effectiveness dynamically through the different phases of natural hazards, surpassing traditional static ratings by evaluating NbS performance across the hazard management cycle—from predisposition to post-event recovery. Significant variation in mitigation scoring was observed for individual hazard classes and types. Erosion processes (e.g., sheet, rill, and gully erosion) achieved the highest mitigation scores (1.90), as they can be addressed by many highly effective NbS (21–33 types). Conversely, flood-related hazards, such as fluvial and pluvial floods, showed moderate scores (1.64–1.66) with a balanced mix of mitigative and supportive NbS, while options for mitigating impact floods and coastal floods were far more limited (1.00–1.42). The resulting methodology provides a crucial, practical link between specific climate-related threats and viable, nature-based responses, serving as a robust framework to guide the decisions of planners, engineers, and policymakers. By enabling a more strategic and temporally aware deployment of NbS, our findings inform the development of adaptive management strategies to ensure their long-term effectiveness.

• Language: English
• Keywords: nature-based solutions (NbS), natural hazards, mitigation and protection, climate change adaptation, critical infrastructure, mitigation scoring, hazard profiles
• Work type: Article
• Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
• Organization: FGG - Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering
• Publication status: Published
• Publication version: Version of Record
• Year: 2025
• Number of pages: 28 str.
• Numbering: Vol. 10, issue 12, art. 318
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-176539
• UDC: 502.131.1:69
• ISSN on article: 2412-3811
• DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures10120318
• COBISS.SI-ID: 259755011
• Publication date in RUL: 03.12.2025

Record is a part of a journal

• Title: Infrastructures
• Shortened title: Infrastructures
• Publisher: MDPI AG
• ISSN: 2412-3811
• COBISS.SI-ID: 526777369

Licences

• License: CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
• Link: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Description: This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: sonaravne rešitve (NbS), naravne nesreče, blaženje in varstvo, prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam, kritična infrastruktura, ocenjevanje blaženja, profili nevarnosti