Details

Zakaj ektogeneza ni rešitev “ženskega vprašanja”?
ID Marič, Mojca (Author), ID Godina, Vesna V. (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (444,54 KB)
MD5: F4EF1043C12945786BABF7D182085175
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.fdv.uni-lj.si/revije/znanstvene-revije/teorija-in-praksa/iz-vsebine/teorija-in-praksa-3-2025 This link opens in a new window
Description: Članek v reviji

Abstract
Temeljena teza pričujočega teksta je, da spremembe reprodukcijskih tehnologij, na primer ektogeneza, ne prinašajo samodejno tudi ukinitve podrejenosti in diskriminacije žensk. Ta teza je podprta z osmimi skupinami argumentov: unilinearna povezanost med tehnologijo in drugimi značilnostmi družb ne obstaja; uporaba tehnologije je kulturno določena; patriarhat ni univerzalen; niso vse ženske v vseh družbah podrejene; otrok ne rojevajo le ženske; nimamo le ene mame; skrbstveno delo za otroke; biologika.Teza je podprta s podatki, zbranimi z dvema temeljnima metodama, s primerjalno analizo literature in primerjalno analizo zahodnih in neevropskih družb.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:antropologija spola, medkulturna analiza družb, ektogeneza, diskriminacija žensk, patriarhat, materinstvo, biologika, reprodukcijske tehnologije
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:28.10.2025
Year:2025
Number of pages:str. 557-578
Numbering:Letn. 62, št. 3
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-175805 This link opens in a new window
UDC:316.472.42:342.72/.73
ISSN on article:0040-3598
DOI:10.51936/tip.62.3.557 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:255272963 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:08.11.2025
Views:107
Downloads:26
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Teorija in praksa
Shortened title:Teor. praksa
Publisher:Fakulteta za sociologijo, politične vede in novinarstvo, Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:763652 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Why ectogenesis does not solve the ‘women’s question’
Abstract:
It is argued in the text that changes in reproductive technologies, for example ectogenesis, are not automatically connected with the elimination of female subordination and discrimination. This contention is supported by eight groups of arguments: no unilinear connection exists between technology and other characteristics of society; the use of technology is culturally defined; patriarchy is not universal; not all women are subordinated; the gender of motherhood is not exclusively female; child-care is not only provided to children and newborn babies by biological mothers; and arguments based on biologics. The presented thesis is supported with data collected using two basic methods, comparative analysis of the literature, and comparative analysis of Western and non-European societies.

Keywords:anthropology of gender, cross-cultural analysis of societies, ectogenesis, discrimination against women, patriarchy, motherhood, biologic, reproductive technologies

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back