Details

Conflicts and policy priorities drive differences in the EU Forest strategy implementation : insights from 15 European countries
ID Pecurul-Botines, Mireia (Author), ID Pezdevšek Malovrh, Špela (Author), et al.

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,85 MB)
MD5: FD6C2F3269F34C9E8EE7731C615E7839
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138993412500231X This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Conflicts have arisen between Member States and the European Commission around the European Union Forest Strategy either because of differing opinions on whether forests should be considered as a commodity, as nature to be conserved, or because of disagreements about the EU's competencies vis-à-vis national sovereignty of forests. These conflicts highlight high and diverging stakes in the EU's governance of forest ecosystems. At the national level, impending changes related to EU regulations impact the forest-based sector and its governance, including monitoring and access to finance. Despite not being legally binding, the EU Forest Strategy is significantly influencing national policies within the broader EU political framework. To what extent this new strategy exacerbates existing conflicts or shapes new ones is not well understood. The main objective of this study is to understand whether and how conflicts and different policy prioritization may influence the implementation of this key EU Strategy at the national level. Theoretically, this study draws on Europeanization studies to understand how different forest-related conflicts are connected to attempts to integrate European forest policy at the EU level. Empirically, an analysis of policy documents and interviews with policy experts in 15 European countries was conducted. Our analysis provides a rich overview of the extent to which diverse national policy developments align with the EU Forest Strategy goals and how these developments connect to existing or newly emerging conflicts around the Strategy's implementation. Based on these insights, we suggest potential ways to overcome the challenges and advance forest policy in Europe.

Language:English
Keywords:forest policy, Europe, EU forest strategy, conflicts, policy path dependencies, Europeanization
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:14 str.
Numbering:Vol. 181, art. 103652
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-175438 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*93+630*97(4-6EU)
ISSN on article:1872-7050
DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103652 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:254934019 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:27.10.2025
Views:170
Downloads:69
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Forest Policy and Economics
Publisher:Elsevier
ISSN:1872-7050
COBISS.SI-ID:23098885 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gozdarska politika, Evropa, gozdarska strategija EU, konflikti, odvisnosti političnih poti, evropeizacija

Projects

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:The governments of Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, and Sweden
Name:EFI’s Multi-Donor Trust Fund for policy support

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back