Aluminium and its alloys are key materials for the production of machine components by machining processes such as turning, milling, and drilling. Although they are generally easy to machine, their machinability varies among different alloys. The best machinability is achieved by free-cutting alloys developed for high-speed CNC machining. Until the early 21st century, lead was the main additive, later primarily in combination with bismuth and tin. Due to the toxicity of lead, the European Union introduced directives (ELV, RoHS, REACH) around 2000, limiting its content to a maximum of 0.40 wt.%, while the RoHS 3 directive (2018/740/EU) further reduced it to 0.1 wt.%.
In this study, we examined the influence of indium on solidification, phase equilibria, thermodynamic stability, process kinetics, and the formation of low-melting phases in the microstructure of the free-cutting alloy EN AW-6026 and technically pure aluminium EN AW-1370. Indium was introduced either in elemental form or as the BiIn master alloy. Particular attention was devoted to the Al-In, Al-Bi-In, Al-Mg-Si-In, and Al Mg Si In-Bi systems, focusing on whether indium occurs as a separate phase or as part of the eutectic. The objective was to assess whether indium can promote the formation of low-melting phases while providing a viable alternative to lead. In the Al In system, indium was found in elemental form and as the In(Al) phase within eutectics (α-Al + Al8Fe2Si + In(Al)) and (α-Al + Al13Fe4 + In(Al)). In the Al-Bi In system, it formed the low-melting BiIn phase and the BiIn(Al) phase, which appeared in the eutectic (α Al + BiIn(Al) + Al8Fe2Si). In the Al-Mg-Si-In and Al-Mg-Si-In-Bi systems, indium was present as a discrete phase or as part of the eutectic (α-Al + Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 + In).
Machinability was investigated only in the EN AW-6026 alloy, with the base alloy and the lead-containing variant serving as references. The results showed that all additions (lead, indium, bismuth, and the BiIn master alloy) improved chip breakability compared to the base alloy. Alloys with indium or BiIn produced more favourable chip shapes during turning, owing to indium present in elemental form or as part of the eutectic (α Al + Al5Cu2Mg8Si6 + In). In contrast, the alloy with bismuth showed no such improvement, attributed to its interaction with magnesium and the formation of the hard intermetallic Bi2Mg3. These findings improve understanding of phase equilibria in the Al-In, Al-Bi-In, Al-Mg-Si-In, and Al-Mg-Si-In-Bi systems, particularly solidification kinetics, thermodynamic stability, and the formation of low-melting phases. They also support further optimisation of alloy composition and clarify the effects of alternative alloying elements on the machinability of aluminium alloys.
|