Privolitveni modeli v sodobnem spolnem kazenskem pravu

Andolšek, Črtomir (author), Korošec, Damjan (mentor)

V magistrski diplomski nalogi obravnavam modele kazenskopravne ureditve spolnih deliktov. Bistvo analize modelov kazenskopravne ureditve jedrnega dela spolnega kazenskega prava je v razumevanju obstoječih modelov, prehajanje med njimi, primerjava, kombinacije, prednosti in slabosti, vse v kontekstu ustreznosti modelov pri skrbi za učinkovito kazensko materialno pravo, ki bo zagotavljalo ustrezen pregon nekaterih družbeno najbolj občutljivih kaznivih dejanj in ki bo hkrati skrbelo za pravno varnost in temeljna pravna načela v kazenskem pravu. Mednarodna in lokalna politična klima, ki je po večini reakcija na odmevne primere sodnih praks po svetu, simptomatično namiguje na krizo modela prisile, ki je domnevno konceptualno nezadosten iz več razlogov, v ospredju predvsem mislimo na posebna stanja žrtve kot so spanec, pasivnost žrtve zaradi strahu, presenečenje in podobno – vse to kot premostljiva težava, za katero rešitev ponujajo modeli soglasja. Modeli kazenskopravne ureditve so predstavljeni skozi prizmo kazenskopravne dogmatike s posebnim poudarkom na posameznih elementih kot so prisila, soglasje in drugi v odnosu do kataloga spolnih kaznivih dejanj posebnega dela in institutov splošnega dela KZ-1.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: Spolna samoodločba, posilstvo, spolno nasilje, model prisile, model soglasja, model »ja pomeni ja«, model »ne pomeni ne«, soglasje, prisila.
• Work type: Master's thesis/paper
• Organization: PF - Faculty of Law
• Year: 2025
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-174982
• COBISS.SI-ID: 257509379
• Publication date in RUL: 11.10.2025

Secondary language

• Language: English
• Title: Consent models in contemporary sexual criminal law

Abstract

In my master's thesis, I discuss models of sexual assault laws. The essence of the analysis of the models of the sexual assault laws (the core part of sexual criminal law) lies in the understanding of the existing models, the transition between them, comparison, combinations, advantages and disadvantages, all in the context of the adequacy of the models in ensuring an effective criminal substantive law that will provide the appropriate prosecution of some of the most socially sensitive criminal offenses and which will, at the same time, take care of legal security and fundamental legal principles in criminal law. The international and local political climate, which is mostly a reaction to high-profile cases of judicial practice around the world, symptomatically hints at the crisis of the model of coercion, which is allegedly conceptually insufficient for several reasons. The reasons that are in the foreground are mostly special states of the victim such as sleep, the victim's passivity due to overwhelming fear, taking advantage of surprise by the perpetrator and the like – all of this as a surmountable problem for which consent based models offer a solution. Models of sexual assault laws are presented through the prism of criminal law dogmatics, with special emphasis on individual elements such as coercion, consent and other in relation to the catalog of sexual crimes of the special part of KZ-1 and the institutes of the general part of KZ-1.

• Keywords: Sexual self-determination, rape, sexual violence, coercion model, consent model, »yes means yes« model, »no means no« model, consent, coercion.