Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Liberal economic institutions reduce relative poverty only in developed, individualist societies : a global analysis, 2000-2019
ID
Rutar, Tibor
(
Author
),
ID
Hočevar, Marko
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,85 MB)
MD5: F1E77F571A14A418AD5412D2CD054045
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X25000924
Image galllery
Abstract
Liberal economic institutions – such as secure property rights, modest regulation, and free in- ternational trade – seem to boost economic development, but how do they relate to relative poverty? Surprisingly, given the social salience of this question in the age of globalization, there is almost no comprehensive research using global panel data and aggregate indices of economic freedom to investigate it. We construct such a dataset with 139 countries, and present fixed- effects and dynamic-panel regressions of relative poverty on liberal economic institutions, measured with the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World (EFW) index. Our baseline finding is that over-time increases in economic freedom – especially freedom of international trade but also limited government size – predict modest decreases in relative poverty. This relationship turns out to be heterogeneous and strongly mediated by unemployment, such that economic freedom decreases unemployment, which in turn decreases relative poverty. Crucially, we find that collectivism, a cultural variable, strongly moderates the relationship between eco- nomic freedom and poverty to the extent that it becomes non-significant in societies tending toward collectivism. Concerning endogeneity, our results are shown to be quite robust to mod- erate levels of omitted-variable bias in formal tests, and reverse causality is not an issue. How- ever, dynamic panel models that include lagged values of the dependent variable among regressors indicate loss of significance for some of our main results, preventing us from claiming complete robustness to endogeneity.
Language:
English
Keywords:
relative poverty
,
economic freedom
,
liberal economic institutions
,
collectivism
,
unemployment
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
17 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 131, [article no.] ǂ103231
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-174656
UDC:
316.334
ISSN on article:
0049-089X
DOI:
10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103231
COBISS.SI-ID:
243850755
Publication date in RUL:
08.10.2025
Views:
119
Downloads:
56
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Social science research : a quarterly journal of social science methodology and quantitative research
Shortened title:
Soc. sci. res.
Publisher:
Academic Press
ISSN:
0049-089X
COBISS.SI-ID:
27465728
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
relativna revščina
,
ekonomska svoboda
,
liberalne ekonomske institucije
,
kolektivizem
,
brezposelnost
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back