Details

Prehransko programiranje razvoja prebavil z netopno vlaknino pri pitovnih piščancih : magistrsko delo
ID Mandir, Urška (Author), ID Rezar, Vida (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Leskovec, Jakob (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,15 MB)
MD5: 86025E3259B029F9BEC9178FF2B34AED

Abstract
Dodatek vlaknine v krmo ima pomemben vpliv na prirejo živali, zlasti pri pitovnih piščancih. Namen poskusa je bil preučiti učinek dodajanja različne koncentracije: 0 %, 10 % in 20 % netopne prehranske vlaknine (nPV) na rast živali in razvoj prebavil. V poskus je bilo vključenih 320 pitovnih piščancev provenience ross 308, razdeljenih v pet poskusnih skupin. Poskus je bil razdeljen na tri dele glede na prehransko strategijo, pri čemer so bile živali krmljene z obroki brez vlaknine ali z dodatkom nPV »on top«. V prvem delu poskusa (od 1. do 12. dne) smo piščance krmili s štarterjem brez dodatka nPV. V drugem delu poskusa smo piščance krmili po naslednjem režimu: kontrolna skupina (k) je dobivala krmno mešanico brez dodatka (nPV-0 %), skupini n10 in v10 sta dobivali krmno mešanico z 10 % vlaknine (nPV-10 %), skupini n20 in v20 sta dobivali krmno mešanico z dodatkom 20 % vlaknine (nPV-20 %). Od 28. do 41. dne (3. del poskusa) smo vse skupine piščancev krmili enako kot v drugem delu, le skupine k, n10 in n20 so dobivale v tem obdobju krmo brez vlaknine (nPV-0 %). Rezultati so pokazali, da dodatek 10 % in 20 % nPV v tretjem delu poskusa ni povečal zauživanja krme, saj med skupinami nismo ugotovili značilnih razlik, so pa piščanci z dodatkom nPV slabše priraščali. Po prenehanju dodajanja nPV v tretjem delu (n10 in n20), vpliv na maso prebavil ni bil več izrazit, medtem ko so piščanci, ki so vlaknino še prejemali (v10, v20), slabše priraščali in imeli večji odstotek praznih prebavil, požiralnika, tankega črevesa, slepih čreves in kolona v primerjavi s skupino k.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:perutnina, pitovni piščanci, prehrana živali, netopna vlaknina, rast, razvoj, prebavila
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:U. Mandir
Year:2025
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (X, [50] str.))
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-174484 This link opens in a new window
UDC:636.5.084/.087(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:251611395 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:03.10.2025
Views:120
Downloads:14
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Nutritional programming of gastrointestinal tract development with insoluble dietary fibre in broiler chickens : M. Sc. thesis
Abstract:
The addition of fibre to feed has a significant impact on animal production, especially in broiler farming. The aim of the experiment was to study the effects of adding different concentrations: 0%, 10%, and 20% non-digestible dietary fibre (nPV) on the growth and development of the gastrointestinal tract. The experiment involved 320 broiler chickens of the Ross 308, which were divided into five experimental groups. The trial was divided into three parts according to the feeding strategy, with the animals were fed meal without fibre or with the addition of nPV "on top." In the first part of the trial (from day 1 to day 12), the chickens were fed a starter feed without the addition of nPV. From day 13 to day 27 (part 2 of the trial), the chickens were fed according to the following scheme: The control group (k) received feed without additives (nPV-0%), groups n10 and v10 received a feed mixture with 10% fibre (nPV-10%), groups n20 and v20 received feed mixture with 20% added fibre (nPV20%). From day 28 to day 41 (part 3 of the trial), all groups of chickens were fed the same diet as in part 2, only groups k, n10 and n20 received feed without fibre (nPV0%) . The results showed that the addition of 10% and 20% nPV in the third part of the experiment did not increase feed intake, as we could not find any statistical differences between the groups, but the chickens with nPV supplementation addition grew worse. In the groups with higher nPV after cessation of nPV in the third part (n10 and n20), the effect on the mass of the intestines was no longer pronounced, while the chickens that continued to receive fibre (v10, v20) grew less and had a higher proportion of empty intestines, oesophagus, small intestine, cecum, and colon compared to group k.

Keywords:poultry, broiler chickens, animal nutrition, insoluble dietary fibre, growth, gastrointestinal tract development

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back