Details

Vpliv stroškov dela na prekarnost
ID Babić, Robert (Author), ID Mišič, Luka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Kos, Marjan (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,87 MB)
MD5: BC37C1470B84FD27D68497104F03E3A6

Abstract
Prekarnost je kompleksen problem, ki ni niti le pravne niti le ekonomske narave. Gre za kompleksno tematiko, ki je prežeta s socialnimi, ekonomskimi, pravnimi, kulturnimi in še kakšnimi dejavniki. Ta magistrska naloga je omejena na strošek dela kot vplivni dejavnik na stopnjo prekarnosti. Delovna opredelitev prekarnosti za namene tega magistrskega dela vsebuje: samozaposlene (s.p.), ki ne zaposlujejo drugih delavcev, zaposlene za določen čas, neprostovoljno zaposlene za krajši delovni čas in agencijske delavce. Pri stroških dela se upošteva razlika med dejanskimi stroški delodajalca, vključno s povračili stroškov za prehrano med delom ter prevozom na delo in z dela, ter dejanskim neto izplačilom delavcu na transakcijski račun. Stroški dela pri redni zaposlitvi v Sloveniji za leto 2025 znašajo 41,59 %, pri najugodnejši atipični alternativi (normiran s.p.) pa 23,09 %. Stopnja prekarnosti v Sloveniji za leto 2024 znaša 24,72 %. Za odgovor na raziskovalno vprašanje je bil uporabljen primerjalnopravni pristop – tako so se analizirali stroški dela in stopnje prekarnosti še treh držav: Češke, Nemčije in Danske. Pri vseh treh državah je bila korelacija potrjena. Tako so na Češkem stroški redne zaposlitve nižji za 3,62 %, stopnja prekarnosti pa za 5,55 %. V Nemčiji so stroški redne zaposlitve nižji za 4,18 %, stopnja prekarnosti pa za 9,25 %. Na Danskem so stroški redne zaposlitve nižji za 10,82 %, stopnja prekarnosti pa za 7,94 %. Pomemben dejavnik pri analizi stroškov dela je tudi model socialne varnosti. Slovenija, Nemčija in Češka so implementirale Bismarckov model socialnih zavarovanj, ki temelji na socialnih prispevkih, ki se zbirajo v namenskih javnih blagajnah, od koder se financirajo posamezne denarne dajatve in dajatve v naravi. Danska je implementirala Beveridgeov model socialne varnosti, ki temelji na enotnih dajatvah, ki se zbirajo v proračunu, iz katerega se financirajo denarne dajatve in dajatve v naravi. Ob analizi stroškov dela držav OECD je mogoče zaključiti, da imajo v povprečju države z Beveridgeovim modelom socialne varnosti nekoliko nižje stroške dela, vendar se ta primanjkljaj pokrije iz drugih davčnih virov. OECD je Sloveniji že leta 2014 in ponovno 2024 priporočil naj zniža stroške dela, saj ti negativno vplivajo na politiko zaposlovanja in razvoj gospodarstva. Strošek dela je zagotovo eden od dejavnikov, ki ima vpliv na stopnjo prekarnosti, a ni mogoče trditi, da je edini dejavnik vpliva.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:prekarnost, strošek dela, obdavčitev, Bismarckov model, Beveridgeov model, povprečna plača, prispevki, atipične oblike dela, redna zaposlitev, normiran s.p., študentsko delo, platformno delo, agencijsko delo
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-173948 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:257392899 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:25.09.2025
Views:269
Downloads:75
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The impact of labour costs on precarious employment
Abstract:
Precarious work is a complex phenomenon that cannot be explained solely by legal or economic considerations. Rather, it is a multifaceted issue, deeply intertwined with social, economic, legal, cultural, and other factors. This master's thesis focuses specifically on the cost of labour as an influential factor in the prevalence of precarious work. For the purposes of this thesis, the operational definition of precariousness includes: self-employed persons (sole proprietors) without employees, employees on fixed-term contracts, involuntary part-time workers, and agency workers. In the calculation of labour costs, the difference considered is between the employer’s actual costs, including mandatory reimbursement of work-related expenses, prescribed by law, and the employee’s actual net payment to their bank account. In Slovenia, the labour cost for standard employment in 2025 amounts to 41.59 %, whereas for the most favourable atypical alternative (flat-rate sole proprietorship) it amounts to 23.09 %. The rate of precarious work in Slovenia for 2024 is 24.72 %. A comparative legal approach was applied to answer the research question – thus, labour costs and the prevalence of precarious work were analysed in three additional countries: the Czech Republic, Germany, and Denmark. In all three cases, a correlation was confirmed. In the Czech Republic, the cost of standard employment is 3.62 % lower and the rate of precarious work 5.55 % lower. In Germany, the cost of standard employment is 4.18 % lower and the rate of precarious work 9.25 % lower. In Denmark, the cost of standard employment is 10.82 % lower and the rate of precarious work 7.94 % lower. An important factor in the analysis of labour costs is the model of social security. Slovenia, Germany, and the Czech Republic on the one hand have implemented the Bismarck model of social insurance, which is based on social security contributions collected in dedicated public funds from which social security benefits are financed. Denmark, on the other hand, has implemented the Beveridge model of social security, which is based on general taxes collected within the state budget, from which social security benefits are financed. An analysis of OECD country labour costs indicates that, on average, countries with the Beveridge model of social security have somewhat lower labour costs, although this shortfall is offset by other sources of taxation. The OECD recommended Slovenia in both 2014 and again in 2024 to reduce labour costs, as they negatively affect employment policy and economic development. The cost of labour is undoubtedly one of the factors influencing the level of precarious work, but it cannot be claimed to be the only factor.

Keywords:precarious employment, labour costs, taxation, Bismarckian model, Beveridge model, average wage, contributions, atypical forms of work, regular employment, standardized sole proprietorship, student work, platform work, agency work

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back