Details

Privezovanje psov z vidika dobrobiti in zakonodaje : diplomsko delo
ID Skerbiš, Natka (Author), ID Zupan Šemrov, Manja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (523,76 KB)
MD5: 8B80D6ED7A19FB3499BB9634DAFC37F3

Abstract
Diplomsko delo obravnava problematiko privezovanja psov z vidika njihove dobrobiti in zakonodaje. Namen naloge je bil ugotoviti, kako dolgotrajno privezovanje vpliva na fizično in psihično zdravje psa ter v kolikšni meri je ta problematika zajeta v slovenski in tuji zakonodaji. V teoretičnem delu so predstavljene temeljne etološke potrebe psov ter vpliv privezovanja na zadovoljevanje potreb po socialnih stikih, komunikaciji, gibanju in raziskovanju okolja. Pregled literature je pokazal, da dolgotrajno privezovanje onemogoča izražanje naravnega obnašanja in bistveno zmanjšuje dobrobit psa, ki se kaže predvsem v negativnih učinkih, kot so frustracija, kronični stres, vedenjske motnje, fizične poškodbe, izpostavljenost ekstremnim vremenskim vplivom ter povečana dovzetnost za bolezni. V nadaljevanju je obravnavan pravni okvir v Sloveniji, kjer Zakon o zaščiti živali in Pravilnik o zaščiti hišnih živali določata pogoje, pod katerimi je privezovanje dovoljeno. Primerjava z zakonodajo v državah Evropske unije kaže precejšnje razlike, saj je v nekaterih državah privezovanje strogo omejeno ali celo prepovedano, drugje pa je še vedno dovoljeno ob določenih pogojih. Strokovna priporočila enotno opozarjajo, da privezovanje ne sme biti primarna oblika zadrževanja psa, temveč zgolj kratkotrajna rešitev v izjemnih primerih. Sklep naloge je, da privezovanje negativno vpliva na dobrobit psov, zato so potrebni večje ozaveščanje javnosti, okrepljen nadzor in ustreznejši zakonodajni ukrepi.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:psi, dobrobit, zakonodaja, privezovanje
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:N. Skerbiš
Year:2025
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (VIII, [17] str.))
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-173923 This link opens in a new window
UDC:636.7:591.5((043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:250573571 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:25.09.2025
Views:271
Downloads:84
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Tethering of dogs in terms of welfare and legislation : B. Sc. thesis
Abstract:
The thesis deals with the topic of tethering dogs from the perspective of animal welfare and legislation. The aim of the study was to determine how long-term tethering affects the physical and mental health of dogs and to what extent this issue is covered by Slovenian and international legislation. In the theoretical part, the basic ethological needs of dogs and the effects of tethering on the fulfilment of their needs for social interaction, communication, exercise and exploration of the environment are presented. A review of the literature has shown that long-term tethering prevents the expression of natural behaviours and significantly impairs animal welfare, as it mainly leads to negative effects such as frustration, chronic stress, behavioural disorders, physical injuries, exposure to extreme weather conditions and increased susceptibility to diseases. The legal framework in Slovenia is analysed, where the Animal Welfare Act and the Regulations for the Protection of Pet Animals define the conditions under which tethering is allowed. A comparison with the legislation of the member states of the European Union shows considerable differences: In some countries, tethering is strictly restricted or even prohibited, while in others it is still permitted under certain conditions. The experts' recommendations repeatedly emphasise that tethering should not be a primary method of keeping dogs, but only a short-term solution in exceptional cases. The conclusion of this work is that tethering has a negative impact on the welfare of dogs. Therefore, greater public awareness, increased monitoring and more effective legal measures are needed.

Keywords:dogs, welfare, legislation, tethering

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back