Introduction: Chronic non-specific low back pain is a significant public health issue with a prevalence rate of 18%. It presents with a heterogeneous clinical presentation, often including deficits in muscle performance and reduced functional capacity. In clinical practice, the heel-rise test is commonly used to assess the muscle performance of the plantar flexors. A normative value of 25 repetitions has been established for healthy adults in the age range of 20 to 59 years. Purpose: The purpose of this master's thesis was to obtain normative values for the heel-rise test in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain, to examine the relationship between the heel-rise test and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and to investigate the association between the heel-rise test and physical activity levels. Methods: The study included 100 adults with chronic non-specific low back pain, with an average age of 55 years. A convenience sample was used, consisting of individuals undergoing a three-week rehabilitation program at the time of data collection. The heel-rise test was used to assess plantar flexor performance, while functional disability was evaluated using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Results: The mean number of heel-rise repetitions was 27.4 (SD = 12.3), with no statistically significant difference compared to healthy individuals. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the heel-rise test and regular physical activity (r = 0.28–0.33; p < 0.01), as well as a statistically significant negative correlation was found between the heel-rise test and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (r = -0.38; p < 0.01). Discussion and conclusion: Our research provides new insights into the functional status of individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain, since it examines a distal muscle group, namely the plantar flexors. The results show that individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain do not have reduced plantar flexor performance, although it significantly correlates with both physical activity levels and functional disability. To improve the clinical utility of the test, it is important to standardize the testing protocol and incorporate additional parameters to achieve more accurate assessment. It is reasonable to use reliable mobile applications and to consider additional factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities that may affect test performance.
|