Details

Primerjava dveh metod za oceno količine zemeljskih del v načrtu gozdne ceste
ID Valner, Žan (Author), ID Poje, Anton (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Robek, Robert (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (5,60 MB)
MD5: EBF20D21C05A3AE0752C48290E37677D

Abstract
V magistrskem delu smo preučevali vpliv metode zajema terenskih podatkov na predvidene količine zemeljskih del v projektu gozdne ceste. S tem namenom smo pripravili tri idejne projekte, od tega eno novogradnjo in dve rekonstrukciji gozdnih cest. Med seboj smo primerjali tri metode zajema podatkov, in sicer neposredno izmero prečnih profilov na gozdnih cestah ter dva digitalna modela terena z resolucijo 0,5 × 0,5 m. Prvi model je bil pripravljen iz LiDAR oblaka točk posnetih v okviru laserskega skeniranja Slovenije v letu 2014, drugi pa iz oblaka točk, posnetega z brezpilotnim zrakoplovom v letu 2024. Količine zemeljskih del smo skupno ugotavljali na 2.437 m projektiranih gozdnih cest in 210 prečnih profilih. Ugotovili smo, da med analiziranimi metodami ni statistično značilnih razlik v količini zemeljskih del na novogradnji gozdne ceste, medtem ko so razlike značilne pri rekonstrukcijah gozdnih cest. Pri rekonstrukcijah so bile najvišje količine zemeljskih del ugotovljene pri metodi LiDAR2014, ki so bile na ravni objektov do 12,2 % višje kot pri metodi UAV in za 59,2 % kot pri metodi neposredne izmere. Ugotavljamo tudi, da naklon terena značilno povečuje razliko v količinah zemeljskih del med metodami. Rezultati raziskave so pomembni tudi za prakso, saj značilne razlike v količinah zemeljskih del pri rekonstrukcijah gozdnih cest pomenijo tudi razlike v predvidenih stroških izvedbe del.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gozdno gradbeništvo, LiDAR, brezpilotni zrakoplov, zemeljska dela, projektiranje cest
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publisher:[Ž. Valner]
Year:2025
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-173736 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630*38:630*58(043.2)=163.6
COBISS.SI-ID:249825539 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.09.2025
Views:154
Downloads:29
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Comparison of two methods for estimating the quantity of earthworks in a forest road plan
Abstract:
In this master’s thesis, we examined the influence of field data acquisition methods on the estimated volumes of earthworks in a forest road project. For this purpose, three conceptual designs were prepared, one for new construction and two for forest road reconstructions. The study compared three acquisition methods: direct surveying of cross-sections and two digital terrain models with a 0,5 × 0,5 m resolution. The first model was generated from a LiDAR point cloud obtained during the national laser scanning of Slovenia in 2014, while the second was produced from a UAV-derived point cloud in 2024. Earthwork volumes were calculated for 2.437 m of designed forest roads and 210 cross-sections. The results showed no statistically significant differences among the methods in the case of new road construction, while significant differences were observed for reconstructions. For reconstructions, the highest volumes were derived using the LiDAR2014 method, which exceeded UAV-based estimates by up to 12,2% and direct survey estimates by as much as 59,2%. The analysis further indicated that terrain slope significantly increases the differences in earthwork volumes among methods. The findings highlight the practical relevance of method selection, as significant differences in earthwork volumes for forest road reconstructions directly affect projected implementation costs.

Keywords:forest engineering, LiDAR, UAV, earthworks, road design

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back