Details

Dejavniki odločanja zasebnih lastnikov gozdov o sanaciji poškodovanih gozdov po naravnih nesrečah : doktorska disertacija
ID Stare, Darja (Author), ID Pezdevšek Malovrh, Špela (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Grošelj, Petra (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (10,41 MB)
MD5: 36E202AB70E6C8A3FAEAFDDD5C3A9677

Abstract
V raziskavi smo se osredotočili na odzivanje zasebnih lastnikov gozdov (ZLG) po naravnih ujmah ter poiskali ključne dejavnike odločanja o sanaciji poškodovanih gozdov. Z anketo med 1.515 ZLG smo s pomočjo logistične regresije analizirali vpliv socio-demografskih, posestnih, upravljalskih in tržnih dejavnikov na odločitev za sanacijo. Ugotovili smo, da sta najpomembnejša dejavnika pretekle izkušnje z gospodarjenjem z gozdovi in sodelovanje z izvajalci gozdarskih storitev, medtem ko starost, izobrazba ali tržne cene niso imeli statistično značilnega vpliva. S pomočjo metode razvrščanja v skupine, metoda voditeljev K-means, smo identificirali tri skupine ZLG: sodelovalni (32 %), samostojni (42 %) in manj vključeni upravljalci (26 %), ki se razlikujejo po odzivnosti in pripravljenosti na ukrepanje. V nadaljevanju raziskave smo s pomočjo strukturiranega večkriterijskega modela odločanja, ki je združeval metodo Best-Worst method (BWM) ter metodo mehki TOPSIS, ovrednotili ovire, s katerimi se soočajo ZLG pri sanaciji poškodovanih gozdov in rešitve za premostitev teh ovir. Ovire in rešitve smo identificirali s pomočjo pregleda literature, anketiranjem ZLG in intervjuji z deležniki. Ovire so ovrednotili različni deležniki s pomočjo metode BWM. Potem pa so za najpomembnejše ovire, ZLG z uporabo metode mehki TOSPSIS ovrednotili, kako močno jih posamezna rešitev rešuje. Najvišje ocenjene rešitve so bile: spodbujanje povezovanja med ZLG in poslovnega sodelovanja z deležniki v gozdnolesni verigi, izboljšanje svetovanja in informiranja ter uporaba digitalnih orodij. Pomembna se je izkazala tudi potreba po vnaprejšnjem načrtovanju s ciljno določenimi območji in usklajenim delovanjem koordinacijskih skupin. Raziskava prispeva inovativen metodološki pristop za podporo odločanju, ki vključuje različne deležnike vzdolž gozdno-lesne verige in je prenosljiv na druga področja upravljanja naravnih virov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gozdarstvo, ujme, zasebni lastniki, sanitarna sečnja, ovire, rešitve, večkriterijsko odločanje
Work type:Doctoral dissertation
Typology:2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:D. Stare
Year:2025
Number of pages:1 spletni vir (1 datoteka PDF (IX, 131, [9] str.)
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-173484 This link opens in a new window
UDC:630(043.3)
COBISS.SI-ID:250209283 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:18.09.2025
Views:138
Downloads:46
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Factors influencing the decision of private forest owners to carry out sanitary logging after natural disasters : doctoral dissertation
Abstract:
The study focussed on the responses of private forest owners (PFOs) following natural disturbances and identified the key factors influencing their decision making regarding the salvage of damaged forests. Based on a survey of 1,515 PFOs, we used logistic regression to analyse the impact of socio-demographic, ownership, management and market-related factors on the decision to carry out salvage logging. The results showed that previous experience in forest management and cooperation with forestry service providers were the most significant factors, while age, education level and market prices had no statistically significant influence. Using the K-means clustering method, we identified three different PFO groups: outsourcing-oriented (32%), self-reliant (42%) and less active managers (26%), which differ in their responsiveness and willingness to act. In the second part of the study, we developed a structured multi-criteria decision model combining the best-worst method (BWM) and the fuzzy TOPSIS method to assess the barriers faced by PFOs and the effectiveness of the proposed solutions. The barriers and solutions were identified through a literature review, the PFO survey and interviews with stakeholders. The barriers were ranked by the different stakeholders using the BWM method, while the PFOs used fuzzy TOPSIS to assess the extent to which each solution addressed the most important barriers. The highest ranked solutions included fostering collaboration between PFOs and business cooperation with forestbased value chain actors, improving advisory services and information sharing, and utilising digital tools. Strategic planning in advance, with designated intervention areas and coordinated actions by forest coordination teams, also proved to be essential. The study offers an innovative and transferable methodological approach to decision support that involves multiple stakeholders and can be applied to other natural resource management contexts.

Keywords:forestry, natural disturbances, private owners, salvage logging, barriers, solutions, multi-criteria decision-making

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back