Introduction: Nuclear medicine is a diagnostic imaging that uses radiopharmaceuticals to visualize bodily functions for diagnostic imaging and treatment purposes. Special cameras (SPECT and PET) are used to show the distribution and accumulation of radiopharmaceuticals in the body. Myocardial perfusion is an imaging procedure in nuclear medicine that symbolizes the functioning of the heart muscle. In nuclear cardiology, the radioisotope [99mTc]Tc-sestaMIBI is used in SPECT scans. In PET scans, the use of rubidium-82 (82Rb) is dominant, meanwhile the use of flurpiridaz-18 (18F) is growing abroad. Purpose: The purpose of this diploma work is to present the use of SPECT and PET in nuclear cardiology with the systematic review of literature and compare different radiopharmaceuticals. Methods: For this diploma work we used the descriptive method with the systematic review of literature. We searched for scientific articles on different databases. We focused mainly on english and slovenian resources. Results: The procedure of acquiring resources is presented schematically with PRISMA method. Articles that fit the criteria are presented in the table. Article analyse showed that PET has more good properties compared to SPECT. When comparing the articles regarding radiopharmaceuticals, 18F presented itself as the most ideal. Discussion and conclusion: We have determined that PET is superior to SPECT for visualizing myocardial perfusion. PET is superior due to its more accurate attenuation correction, better resolution, lower radiation dose, and shorter examination time. Despite this, SPECT still has certain advantages, which is why it remains more commonly used. The PET radiopharmaceutical 82Rb has also proven to be better than the [99mTc]Tc-sestaMIBI SPECT radiopharmaceutical in terms of radiation dose burden for both the patient and staff, due to its short half-life and faster procedure time. Although 82Rb is most commonly used in nuclear medicine cardiology, it is not the ideal PET radiopharmaceutical. It is important to note that positrons generated during decay have higher energy, which means a longer range and consequently poorer resolution. This drawback is not present with 18F. Due to its favorable properties, 18F has proven superior to [99mTc]Tc-sestaMIBI and 82Rb radiopharmaceuticals. The short range of positrons and the resulting good resolution allow for greater diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, 18F has a better binding affinity to myocardial cells than the previously mentioned radiopharmaceuticals, resulting in higher sensitivity and specificity.
|