The modern power system faces numerous challenges regarding the reliable supply of electricity, with rooftop photovoltaic (PV) systems playing an increasingly important role. A key issue is the consistency and reliability of electricity generated from these sources. One potential solution is the short- or long-term storage of surplus energy using battery storage systems.
This thesis focuses on the development of a simulation model to analyze household electricity production, consumption, and storage using a rooftop PV system combined with a battery storage unit. The model was implemented in Microsoft Excel, providing clear calculations and visualizations, while additional support for visual analysis was provided using Matlab.
The model incorporates real-world data, including household characteristics, solar irradiance data from the ARSO portal, and electricity consumption measurements from the Moj Elektro portal. To ensure data consistency, 15-minute interval consumption measurements were converted to 30-minute intervals. Electricity prices from the energy provider GEN-I and technical specifications from potential PV and battery system suppliers were also included.
A particular challenge addressed in the model is the calculation of energy production based on panel tilt and orientation, which significantly affects the total energy yield. Results are presented through various graphs showing annual electricity consumption, production, and stored energy profiles. A 3D visualization was created to illustrate the investment payback period as a function of system size and storage capacity. Due to limited clarity in the 3D visualization, additional individual graphs were produced to provide a more detailed insight into payback periods for specific storage capacities.
The analysis indicates that the payback period initially decreases with system size and then increases. The optimal system configuration is approximately 10 kWh of battery capacity and 10 PV panels, corresponding to around 5 kW of peak power. These findings are indicative, as both investment costs and payback periods may vary significantly depending on the selected equipment supplier.
|