Details

Skladnost šestminutnega testa hoje in Queen's College testa stopanja pri oceni V̇O▫$_{\rm 2maks}$▫ zdravih mladih oseb
ID Antončič, Jerca (Author), ID Jakovljević, Miroljub (Author), ID Petrič, Maja (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (406,17 KB)
MD5: 1F02DEC07A97CF84DC28D68819D53A3B
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://physio.si/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Fizioterapija_let-33_2025_junij_revija-brez-naslovnice-3-10.pdf This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Uvod: Kardiorespiratorna vzdržljivost je pomemben kazalnik telesnega zdravja. Ocenjujemo jo z vrednostjo maksimalne porabe kisika. Namen raziskave je bil preveriti skladnost šestminutnega testa hoje in Queen's College testa stopanja pri določanju vrednosti maksimalne porabe kisika zdravih mladih odraslih. Metode: Sodelovalo je 32 zdravih mladih odraslih (povprečna starost (standardni odklon) 22,4 (1,5) leta). Pred testiranjem so bile z vprašalnikom preverjene morebitne kontraindikacije. Preiskovanci so v istem dnevu opravili oba t esta. Iz dobljenih rezultatov je bila na podlagi spola in frekvence srčnega utripa izračunana ocena vrednosti maksimalne porabe kisika pri obeh testih, s 15-stopenjsko lestvico občutenja napora pa ocenjen zaznani napor ob izvedbi posameznega testa. Testa sta bila primerjana glede na izračunano oceno vrednosti maksimalne porabe kisika in oceno zaznanega napora. Rezultati: Povprečna maksimalna poraba kisika je pri šestminutnem testu hoje znašala 44,15 (4,84) ml/kg/min, pri Queen's College testu stopanja pa 42,15 (8,34) ml/kg/min. Povprečna razlika maksimalne porabe kisika med testoma (2,01 (6,74) ml/kg/min) ni presegla vnaprej določene največje sprejemljive razlike 3,00 ml/kg/min. Zaključki: Kljub primerljivosti izračunane ocene maksimalne porabe kisika med testoma je bilo ugotovljeno, da testa nista zamenljiva pri določanju vrednosti maksimalne porabe kisika.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:kardiorespiratorna vzdržljivost, telesna dejavnost, maksimalna poraba kisika, frekvenca srčnega utripa, ocena zaznanega napora
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.06.2025
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 1-8
Numbering:Letn. 33, št. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-171432 This link opens in a new window
UDC:615.8
ISSN on article:1318-2102
COBISS.SI-ID:245975555 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.08.2025
Views:485
Downloads:130
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Fizioterapija
Shortened title:Fizioterapija
Publisher:Društvo fizioterapevtov Slovenije, Društvo fizioterapevtov Slovenije, Združenje fizioterapevtov Slovenije
ISSN:1318-2102
COBISS.SI-ID:30074880 This link opens in a new window

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Agreement between V̇O[sub]2max estimated from six-minute walk test and Queen's College step test in healthy young adults
Abstract:
Background: Cardiorespiratory endurance is an important indicator of physical health, commonly measured as maximum oxygen uptake. The purpose of this study was to assess whether an agreement exists between V̇ O2max estimated from the 6-minute walk test and the Queen's College step test in healthy young adults. Methods: 32 healthy young adults (mean age (standard deviation) 22.4 (1.5) years) completed a questionnaire to check for contraindications before participating in both tests on the same day. Based on the obtained results, the estimated maximal oxygen consumption for each test was calculated using sex and heart rate data. Additionally, the perceived exertion for each test was evaluated using the 15-category perceived exertion scale. The tests were compared based on the estimated maximum oxygen uptake and perceived exertion estimations. Results: The mean maximum oxygen uptake in the 6- minute walk test was 44.15 (4.84) ml/kg/min and in the Queen's College step test was 42.15 (8.34) ml/kg/min. The mean difference maximum oxygen uptake between tests (2.01 (6.74) ml/kg/min) did not exceed maximum acceptable difference of 3.00 ml/kg/min determined a priori. Conclusions: Although the estimated calculation showed comparable maximum oxygen uptake values between the two tests, they were not interchangeable.

Keywords:cardiorespiratory endurance, physical activity, maximum oxygen uptake, heart rate, perceived exertion rating

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back