Details

Prepoved aneksije po mednarodnem pravu s posebnim ozirom na primer Primorske
ID Pollak, Peter (Author), ID Sancin, Vasilka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,84 MB)
MD5: F6954D941551F24D8AA2625097A53708

Abstract
Aneksija pomeni prisilno priključitev ozemlja ene države drugi državi. Zgodovinsko je eden izmed glavnih načinov pridobitve ozemlja. Sledi lahko tudi sklenitvi mirovne pogodbe, s katero država zmagovalka z grožnjo, ali uporabo sile prisili državo poraženko v cesijo njenega ozemlja. Tak prenos suverenosti nad ozemljem moramo ločiti od prostovoljne cesije. Prepoved aneksije je danes uveljavljena kot pravilo običajnega mednarodnega prava, vendar pa sta obseg in uporaba tega pravnega pravila vse pogosteje predmet razprav. Za razumevanje pravil običajnega prava je pomembno razumevanje njihovega zgodovinskega razvoja, kar velja tudi za izoblikovanje pravil prepovedi aneksije in negativno obveznost njenega nepriznavanja. Magistrsko diplomsko delo zajame razvoj tega pravnega pravila skozi tri pomembna obdobja v zgodovini, s poudarkom na veljavni pravni ureditvi in dveh aktualnih kršitvah te prepovedi, obdela pa tudi vprašanje, ali gre pri prepovedi aneksije za ius cogens pravilo mednarodnega prava. V luči razprav v Sloveniji, glede preimenovanja praznika dan vrnitve Primorske k matični domovini” v “dan priključitve Primorske k matični domovini”, magistrsko diplomsko delo oriše dogajanja, ki so vodila do aneksije Primorske s strani Italije po sklenitvi Rapalske pogodbe (1920), ter kasnejši prenos suverenosti nad ozemljem Primorske na Jugoslavijo, ki se je začel s Pariško mirovno pogodbo iz leta 1947 in zaključil s sklenitvijo Osimskih sporazumov leta 1975 ter odgovori na vprašanje, zakaj preimenovanje praznika mednarodnopravno ni utemeljeno.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:aneksija, mirovne pogodbe, uporaba sile, grožnja, prisila, cesija, ozemeljska celovitost, Primorska
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2025
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-171248 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:246835715 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.08.2025
Views:307
Downloads:75
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Prohibition of annexations in international law, with special emphasis on the case of Primorska region
Abstract:
Annexation means the forcible acquisition of territory of one state by another state. Historically, it was one of the main modes of acquiring territory. It could also be effected by the conclusion of a peace treaty, through which the victorious state, by threat or use of force, compels the defeated state to cede its territory. Such a transfer of sovereignty must be distinguished from voluntary cession. The prohibition of annexation is today recognized as a rule of customary international law; however, its scope and application are increasingly subject to debate. For the understanding of customary law rules, it is important to understand their historical development, which also applies to the formation of the rules on the prohibition of annexation and the negative obligation of its non-recognition. This thesis traces the development of this legal rule through three key historical periods, with particular emphasis on the current legal framework and two recent violations of the prohibition, it also addresses the question of whether the prohibition of annexation constitutes a ius cogens rule of international law. In the light of public debates in Slovenia concerning the renaming of the holiday "Day of the Return of Primorska to the Homeland" to "Day of the Annexation of Primorska to the Homeland," the thesis outlines the historical events that led to the annexation of Primorska by Italy following the conclusion of the Treaty of Rapallo (1920), and the subsequent transfer of sovereignty over the territory of Primorska region to Yugoslavia, which began with the 1947 Peace Treaty of Paris and concluded with the signing of the Osimo Agreements in 1975 and answers the question why such a renaming of the holiday is not appropriate under international law.

Keywords:annexation, peace treaties, use of force, threat, coercion, cession, territorial integrity, Primorska region

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back