Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Mechanical differences between standard arm and foot chest compressions : a randomised crossover study
ID
Slabe, Damjan
(
Author
),
ID
Dolenc, Eva
(
Author
),
ID
Fošnarič, Miha
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(1,24 MB)
MD5: A6E2E01863224FDAB0D48768C59D60B7
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001870
Image galllery
Abstract
Introduction: The standard method of resuscitation chest compression (CC) is the two-handed chest compression (HCC), whereas the quality of foot chest compressions (FCCs) has not yet been sufficiently investigated. This study aimed to compare the mechanical characteristics of foot and two-handed chest compressions to identify differences in quality and potential safety concerns between HCCs and FCCs. Methods: This was a randomised crossover manikin study. The outcomes measured included the time course of the magnitude and direction of the force exerted by the manikin on the force plate during resuscitation and components of high-quality CCs. Results: While the maximal force exerted during FCCs was approximately 5 % lower than during HCCs, the angle of this maximal force from the vertical was nearly twice as large in FCCs (p < 0.0001). Participants performing FCCs achieved a lower mean CC depth (p < 0.001), consistent with the smaller maximal force. The rate of FCCs was slower than that of HCCs (p < 0.001), and the total number of compressions performed differed significantly between the two methods (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The method of compression influences both the magnitude and angle of the force applied. FCCs were associated with significantly lower quality metrics. Nevertheless, on average, participants in both groups achieved CC parameters that were within or close to the recommended guideline ranges.
Language:
English
Keywords:
basic life support
,
force
,
alternative methods
,
resuscitation
,
chest compressions
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2025
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
8 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 25, art. 101050
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-171206
UDC:
614.88
ISSN on article:
2666-5204
DOI:
10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101050
COBISS.SI-ID:
245940739
Publication date in RUL:
19.08.2025
Views:
258
Downloads:
53
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Resuscitation plus
Publisher:
Elsevier B.V.
ISSN:
2666-5204
COBISS.SI-ID:
56298755
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:
A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back