Details

Transcultural inquiry and the method of philosophical sublation
ID Rošker, Jana S. (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file. The content of the document unavailable until 29.01.2027.
MD5: 7B99C226B957C4FC14E674BC3B573968
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003563280-7 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
In this chapter, I aim to introduce a new method of transcultural philosophical inquiry, tentatively denoted as the method of sublation. It presents an innovative and comprehensive approach to transcultural philosophical analysis. The method offers an innovative framework for engaging with different philosophical traditions, focusing on dynamic interactions and the generation of new insights rather than static comparisons. Applying this method to Chinese and Western philosophies offers a rich avenue for exploration. The name “sublation” itself is derived from Hegelian dialectics, for this method assumes a distinct interpretation rooted in its etymological foundations of elimination, preservation, and elevation. However, it is crucial to note that these three fundamental notions are the sole connections between the post-comparative transcultural sublation and the Hegelian usage of the concept. It is also important to note that the sublation method is rooted in dynamic paradigms of processual philosophy. It veers away from adhering to the formal laws of identity, contradiction, and the excluded third. Unlike the conventional Hegelian model, it does not yield an entirely new, distinct, qualitatively different synthesis as the fusion of two opposing ideas engaged in dialectical interaction. Contrastingly, the zenith of this process manifests in a pivotal stage encompassing a transformative shift that emerges from the tension inherent in the dialectical relation between the two comparata and propels our cognition toward fresh and innovative insights.

Language:English
Keywords:transcultural philsophy, intercultrual studies, the method of sublation, comparative philosophy
Typology:1.16 - Independent Scientific Component Part or a Chapter in a Monograph
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Author Accepted Manuscript
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 106-126
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-171192 This link opens in a new window
UDC:1
DOI:10.4324/9781003563280-7 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:244696579 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:18.08.2025
Views:239
Downloads:22
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a monograph

Title:Inquiry : philosophical perspectives
Editors:Aaron B. Creller, Jonathan Matheson
Place of publishing:New York (NY)
Publisher:Routledge
ISBN:978-1-03-291432-9
COBISS.SI-ID:244694019 This link opens in a new window
Collection title:Routledge studies in epistemology

Licences

License:CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:transkulturna filozofija, medkulturna študije, metoda sublacije, primerjalna filozofija

Projects

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P6-0243
Name:Azijski jeziki in kulture

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:J6-50208
Name:Novi teoretski pristopi k primerjalni transkulturni filozofiji in metoda sublacije

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back