Details

Genomic literacy in nursing : a systematic scoping review of the literature
ID Dante, Angelo (Author), ID Masotta, Vittorio (Author), ID Paoli, Ilaria (Author), ID Caponnetto, Valeria (Author), ID Caples, Maria (Author), ID Laaksonen, Mari (Author), ID Kamenšek, Tina (Author), ID Petrucci, Christina (Author), ID Lancia, Loreto (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,59 MB)
MD5: 477142F691274E81EDEE77E293D1DD42
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/7/e100054 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Objective To map the available evidence on genomic literacy among clinical nurses, nursing students and nursing faculty. Design Systematic scoping review. Data sources A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and OpenGrey. The review included studies published in English from 1 January 2001 to 28 May 2025. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies that referenced ‘genomic literacy’ in health-related or educational contexts and focused on nurses, nursing students or nursing faculty were included. Articles had to provide data on study design, population, setting, data collection tools and outcomes related to genomic literacy. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted and summarised data on study characteristics, including publication year, country, setting, aims, methods, population, assessment tools, outcomes and educational interventions. Findings were synthesised descriptively. Results Of 1534 studies identified, 63 met the inclusion criteria. Most were observational (69.8%) and conducted in the USA (41.3%), focusing on clinical nurses (50.8%) in educational (47.6%) or clinical (46.0%) settings. Genomic literacy was predominantly assessed using ad hoc tools (46.0%) or the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory, revealing low literacy levels. Mean scores ranged from 5.66 to 16.21 out of 31 (18.3%–52.3% correct answers). Educational interventions demonstrated effectiveness in improving genomic knowledge. Conclusions Genomic literacy among nurses, students and faculty remains low, with notable heterogeneity across countries. Many studies used non-standardised assessment tools with uncertain reliability and genomic literacy among nursing faculty remains underexplored. Educational interventions show promise in enhancing genomic literacy.

Language:English
Keywords:nursing, genomic literacy, education
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2025
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 1-11
Numbering:Vol. 15, iss. 7, art. e100054
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-170791 This link opens in a new window
UDC:616-083
ISSN on article:2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100054 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:242685443 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:16.07.2025
Views:232
Downloads:29
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:BMJ open
Publisher:BMJ Publishing
ISSN:2044-6055
COBISS.SI-ID:30480601 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Secondary language

Language:Undetermined
Keywords:zdravstvena nega, genomska pismenost, izobraževanje

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back