Details

Analiza učinkovitosti razcepljenih baznih preurejevalcev povezanih z ovitimi vijačnicami v človeški celični liniji HEK293
ID Javornik, Anja (Author), ID Lainšček, Duško (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file. The content of the document unavailable until 15.07.2026.
MD5: 0087187C5D21D7ADE1DA2B3909B51D88

Abstract
Bazni preurejevalci so biotehnološko orodje za preurejanje genoma in omogočajo natančno spreminjanje baznih parov na tarčnem zaporedju brez ustvarjanja dvojnoverižnih prelomov v DNA. Citozinski (CBE) oziroma adeninski bazni preurejevalci (ABE) so sestavljeni iz fuzije nikaze Cas9 (nCas9) ter citozinske ali adeninske deaminaze. V magistrskem delu predstavljamo sistem baznega preurejanja, ki temelji na razcepljenih baznih preurejevalcih (ccBE). nCas9 in deaminaza sta v tem primeru nekovalentno povezana preko dveh peptidov, ki tvorita ovito vijačnico. V človeško celično linijo HEK293 smo s transfekcijo vnesli plazmide z zapisom za izražanje ccCBE ali osnovnega fuzijskega baznega preurejevalca TadCBEa ter ugotovili, da se njihova učinkovitost na nobenem lokusu ne razlikuje. S titracijo plazmidov z geni za nCas9 in deaminazno podenoto razcepljenega adeninskega baznega preurejevalca smo na poročevalski celični liniji na osnovi HEK293 določili optimalno razmerje plazmidov za nCas9 in deaminazno podenoto 20:1. Na štirih izbranih genomskih lokusih smo primerjali delovanje ccCBE pri razmerjih deaminaze in nCas9 1:1 in 1:20. Pokazali smo, da je pri obeh razmerjih učinkovitost preurejanja tarčne baze ter preurejanja sosednjih netarčnih baz primerljiva. Čeprav izbrano razmerje ni pokazalo večje učinkovitosti pri preurejanju tarčne baze s ccCBE v primerjavi s TadCBE, smo ugotovili, da je sistem enako aktiven, če uporabimo 20-krat nižjo koncentracijo plazmida z deaminazo, kot plazmida z nCas9. Na koncu smo za vse na novo pripravljene preurejevalce določili še okno preurejanja in ugotovili, da imajo najvišjo učinkovitost preurejanja med položaji od tri do sedem baz od začetka sekvence tarčnega zaporedja (5' do 3'). Razliko med preurejevalci smo opazili pri ccCBE 1:1, ki ima na položaju šest in sedem manjše delovanje v primerjavi s ccCBE 20:1 in fuzijskim CBE.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:CRISPR, preurejanje genoma, razcepljeni bazni preurejevalci, ovite vijačnice
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Year:2025
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-170446 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:241816835 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:06.07.2025
Views:349
Downloads:0
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Genome editing efficiency determination using coiled-coils tethered split base editors in HEK293 human cell line
Abstract:
Base editors are biotechnological tools used for genome editing that enable precise modification of base pairs at the target sequences, without creating double strand breaks in DNA. Cytosine (CBE) and adenine base editors (ABE) consist of a fusion between Cas9 nickase (nCas9) and a cytosine or adenine deaminase. In this master's thesis, we present a base editing system based on split base editors (ccBE), in which nCas9 and the deaminase are non-covalently linked via two peptides that form a coiled-coil. We transfected human HEK293 cells with plasmids encoding either the ccCBE or the standard fusion base editor TadCBEa and found no significant difference in their editing efficiency across any of the tested loci. Using a reporter HEK293 based cell line, we titrated plasmids carrying genes for nCas9 and the deaminase subunit of the split adenine base editor, and determined that the optimal plasmid ratio for nCas9 to deaminase subunit is 20:1. We then compared the activity of ccCBE at two different nCas9:deaminase ratios 1:1 and 20:1, across four selected genomic loci. We showed that both ratios resulted in comparable editing efficiency of the target base, as well as similar levels of bystander editing at nearby positions. Although the 20:1 ratio did not show increased target base editing efficiency with ccCBE compared to TadCBE, we demonstrated that the system remains equally active when using a 20-fold lower concentration of the deaminase-encoding plasmid than that of nCas9. Finally, we determined the editing windows of all newly developed editors and found that the highest editing efficiency occurred between positions three and seven from the beginning of the target sequence (5' to 3'). A difference was observed with ccCBE 1:1, which showed reduced activity at positions six and seven compared to ccCBE 20:1 and the fusion CBE.

Keywords:CRISPR, genome editing, split base editors, coiled coils

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back