Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Tragedy of commons, civil drones and hybrid modes of technology regulation : a comparative law and economics perspective
ID
Kovač, Mitja
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(483,02 KB)
MD5: 32F6DDC3303B4F2A05B41EF35372287B
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://ojs.unito.it/index.php/JLMI/article/view/10741
Image galllery
Abstract
This paper provides a multidisciplinary assessment of the growing use and importance of civil drones, evaluates the related problem of the commons, and seeks to assess its impact on the research & development processes in companies that develop or employ civil drones in their daily operations. Recommendations are given to ensure optimal regulatory intervention covering potential, uncontemplated automated civil drone-related hazards. If it evolves in ways not intended by its designers or users, the judgement-proof automated civil drone could create unforeseeable losses wherever current tort and contract law regimes do not ensure optimal risk internalisation and precaution, while also not deterring opportunism. Moreover, it is argued in the paper that the identified shortcomings mean the debate on the different approaches to controlling hazardous activities boils down to the question of efficient ex ante safety regulation and allocation of property rights (resembling those in the aviation industry). Hybrid modes of regulation are also investigated with a focus on the inclusive growth of the AI-drone industry in the EU and a set of economically informed normative suggestions is presented for an improved hybrid regulatory response, which should achieve optimal risk internalisation, precaution, and firm-level innovation.
Language:
English
Keywords:
technology
,
innovations
,
government regulation
,
comparative law
,
drones
,
drone-related hazards
,
efficiency
,
inclusive growth
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
EF - School of Economics and Business
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
Str. 179-211
Numbering:
Vol. 3, iss. 2
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-170339
UDC:
346
ISSN on article:
2785-7867
DOI:
10.13135/2785-7867/10741
COBISS.SI-ID:
203035139
Publication date in RUL:
03.07.2025
Views:
266
Downloads:
51
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Journal of law, market & innovation
Shortened title:
J.Law Mark. Innov.
Publisher:
Università degli Studi di Torino
ISSN:
2785-7867
COBISS.SI-ID:
203026179
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
tehnologija
,
inovacije
,
administrativni ukrepi
,
primerjalno pravo
Projects
Funder:
ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:
P5-0128
Name:
Izzivi vključujočega in trajnostnega razvoja v prevladujoči paradigmi ekonomskih in poslovnih znanosti
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back