The aim of this thesis is to examine the response of a nuclear power plant to a rapid change in power and the procedure for its emergency shutdown. As part of the thesis, the basic structure of a pressurized water reactor nuclear power plant is presented, with an emphasis on its key components. The analysis is based on simulations performed using the PCTRAN program, which employs a simplified model of a nuclear power plant with a pressurized water reactor.
In the case of a rapid power change, the reactor power was reduced from full power 100 \% to 90 \% at a rate of 20 \% per minute. This power reduction was achieved through the partial insertion of control rods. As a result, steam flow to the turbine decreased, leading to a reduction in the plant's electrical output. In the primary system, the reactor coolant temperature dropped, and the pressure decreased by approximately 2 bar, then gradually returned to its original value of 155 bar. The reactor power was reduced to 90 \%, which also led to a decrease in fuel temperature. In the steam generator, the heat transfer rate declined, along with the feedwater and steam flow rates. The water level in the pressurizer dropped, and the activation of the electric heaters ensured that pressure in the primary system was maintained within the saturation range. The chemical and volume control system continuously maintained a stable water level in the pressurizer. During the power reduction, flow in this system was temporarily interrupted and later restored once the conditions stabilized.
An emergency reactor shutdown is carried out in case of abnormal conditions to ensure safety. In this thesis, the selected initiating event for the shutdown was the trip of the reactor coolant pump in loop A. This event triggered the automatic insertion of all control rods, leading to the immediate and complete shutdown of the reactor. The turbine power instantly dropped to 0 \%. In the primary system, both the pressure and temperature of the reactor coolant decreased following the reactor shutdown. Coolant flow in loop A ceased due to the pump trip, while flow in loop B increased to partially compensate for the changes. In the steam generator, system disturbances caused a pressure increase, while both steam and feedwater flows decreased. Immediately after the reactor shutdown, the pressurizer heaters automatically activated to maintain pressure within the saturation range. At the same time, the water level in the pressurizer began to decline. The chemical and volume control system temporarily stopped its flow during the shutdown but later resumed operation as the system stabilized.
|