Details

Negovorne oralnomotorične vaje v terapiji funkcionalnih motenj govorjenih glasov : magistrsko delo
ID Klinc, Ana (Author), ID Kogovšek, Damjana (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Novšak Brce, Jerneja (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,14 MB)
MD5: AD8E9261B831F9903E2F1B8D68F2821C

Abstract
Negovorne oralnomotorične vaje (NOMV) so med logopedi že leta priljubljena tehnika, v zadnjih desetletjih pa so predmet mnogih raziskav in razprav, predvsem z vidika vprašanja učinkovitosti za izboljšanje govorne produkcije. Raziskave o uporabi NOMV med logopedi v svetu kažejo, da jih ti uporabljajo v terapiji mnogih motenj, najpogosteje v terapiji dizartrij, otroške govorne apraksije in funkcionalnih motenj govorjenih glasov, učinkovitost NOMV pa je za izboljšanje govorne produkcije vprašljiva z več vidikov. Obstoječa literatura namreč ne zagotavlja dovolj dokazov, ki bi podprli ali ovrgli uporabo NOMV za izboljšanje govorne produkcije, obstoječi dokazi pa so z vidika z dokazi podprte prakse šibki oz. nizke stopnje. Uporabo vaj bi sicer lahko zagovarjali s stališča teoretičnih predpostavk za uporabo NOMV, vendar tudi te mnogi avtorji postavljajo pod vprašaj. V raziskavi smo z avtorskim anketnim vprašalnikom, ki so ga reševali slovenski logopedi, osvetlili nejasnosti v terminologiji, razširjenost in specifiko uporabe NOMV, predvsem v terapiji funkcionalnih motenj govorjenih glasov, prepričanja logopedov o učinkovitosti ter njihove dileme. Ugotavljamo, da slovenski logopedi za NOMV uporabljajo izjemno veliko različnih poimenovanj, najpogosteje pa termin vaje motorike govoril (VMG). Termin VMG pojmujejo zelo široko ter vanj vključujejo tako negovorne kot tudi govorne vaje, zato bi bila za vzpostavitev nedvoumne terminologije ustrezna rešitev uporaba termina negovorne oralnomotorične vaje, ki dovolj jasno izraža, da gre zgolj za motorične vaje govoril brez hkratnega izgovarjanja glasov (fonemov). Večina logopedov vaje uporablja tudi v terapiji funkcionalnih motenj govorjenih glasov, ob tem pa niso prepričani v dejansko učinkovitost za pridobivanje ali korekcijo glasov. Sami poudarjajo smotrno uporabo vaj, hkrati pa odgovori razkrivajo pomanjkanje gotovosti in/ali védenja o dokazih in osnovnih mehanizmih delovanja NOMV, ki bi jim bili osnova v odločanju, ali je uporaba določene vaje utemeljena in razumna. Rezultati raziskave potrjujejo potrebo po razjasnitvi mnogih dilem na področju NOMV v slovenski logopedski stroki, prav tako so lahko podlaga za načrtovanje nadaljnjih raziskav, dodatnih izobraževanj za logopede in tudi za izobraževanja bodočih logopedov.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:negovorne oralnomotorične vaje, funkcionalne motnje govorjenih glasov, logopedska terapija, terminologija, učinkovitost, z dokazi podprta praksa, govorna terapija
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:A. Klinc
Year:2025
Number of pages:IX, 89 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-169094 This link opens in a new window
UDC:376(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:235532803 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:11.05.2025
Views:436
Downloads:50
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Non-speech oral motor exercises in the therapy of functional speech sound disorders
Abstract:
Non-Speech Oral Motor Exercises (NSOME) have been popular technique among speech-language pathologists (SLPs) for years. In recent decades, they have been the subject of numerous studies and debates, particularly regarding their effectiveness in improving speech production. Studies on NSOME usage among SLPs worldwide indicate that these exercises are applied in therapy for various disorders, most commonly in the treatment of dysarthria, childhood apraxia of speech, and functional speech sound disorders (FSSD). However, their effectiveness in enhancing speech production remains questionable. Existing literature does not provide sufficient evidence to support or refute NSOME’s use for speech improvement, and from an evidence-based practice (EBP) perspective, the current evidence is weak or of low level of evidence. While theoretical assumptions could justify NSOME use, many researchers challenge these principles. In our study, we conducted a survey among Slovenian SLPs to examine terminological ambiguities, the prevalence and specifics of NSOME usage—particularly in FSSD therapy—SLPs’ beliefs about their effectiveness, and related dilemmas. We found that Slovenian SLPs use a wide range of terms for NSOME, most frequently speech articulator motor exercises (slo. vaje motorike govoril). This term is broadly defined, encompassing both speech and non-speech exercises. To establish clearer terminology, non-speech oral motor exercises would be a more precise term, as it explicitly refers to motor exercises of the speech articulators without simultaneous phoneme production. Most SLPs use NSOME in FSSD therapy but are uncertain about their actual effectiveness for acquiring or correcting speech sounds. They emphasize the prudent use of exercises, yet the responses reveal a lack of certainty and/or knowledge about the evidence and underlying mechanisms of NSOME, which would serve as a basis for determining whether the use of a particular exercise is justified and reasonable.The study confirms the need to clarify many dilemmas related to NSOME in Slovenian speech-language pathology. It also provides a basis for further research, additional training for practicing SLPs, and education for future professionals.

Keywords:non-speech oral motor exercises, functional speech sound disorders, speech therapy, terminology, effectiveness, evidence-based practice

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back