Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Comparison of anteroposterior and posteroanterior projection in erect pelvic radiography
ID
Hajdarević, Amir
(
Author
),
ID
Mekiš, Nejc
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(792,69 KB)
MD5: 8BA7BB6BDD92980D49D8D0CF306CA66C
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804325002040
Image galllery
Abstract
Purpose: The X-ray examination of the pelvis is one of the procedures with the highest radiation dose and the most common X-ray examination. For this reason, this study investigated whether the alternative posteroanterior (PA) projection can be used instead of the established anteroposterior (AP) projection to perform pelvic radiography in an erect position. Methods: The study was conducted in a clinical setting on 100 patients who were referred to erect pelvic radiography. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups of 50; the first group was imaged in the AP projection, and the second group in the PA projection. Weight and height were measured for each patient, from which the body mass index was calculated. During imaging, the source-to-patient was measured, and the tube voltage, tube current and time product, Dose Area Product (DAP), source-to-image receptor distance, and primary field size were collated. Based on these data, the entrance surface dose (ESD) and the effective dose, as well as the dose to selected organs, were calculated. In addition to measured dosimetric values, image quality was also assessed by three experienced radiologists using ViewDEX 2.57 software. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the AP and PA projection of erect pelvic radiography for DAP and ESD. On the other hand, a statistically significant difference of 51.5 % (p < 0.001) was found when comparing the effective dose. There were no statistically significant differences between the image quality of the radiographs taken in the PA in AP projection. Conclusion: Based on the above results, we can conclude that PA projection should be the method of choice when performing an erect pelvic radiography due to a significant decrease in effective dose.
Language:
English
Keywords:
pelvic radiography
,
dose reduction
,
image quality
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
6 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 222, art. 111859
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-169047
UDC:
616-07
ISSN on article:
1872-9800
DOI:
10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.111859
COBISS.SI-ID:
235212803
Publication date in RUL:
08.05.2025
Views:
448
Downloads:
102
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Applied radiation and isotopes
Publisher:
Elsevier
ISSN:
1872-9800
COBISS.SI-ID:
23195141
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back