Details

Generalist vs physical education specialist elementary school teacher : do teacher characteristics matter?
ID Gerovac, Ana (Author), ID Emeljanovas, Arunas (Author), ID Petrušič, Tanja (Author), ID Novak, Dario (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (411,97 KB)
MD5: 48031096EE58B24D8CA7EF5F7CDE5545
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.kinsi.si/en/archive/2025/506/ucitelj-razrednega-pouka-ali-sportni-pedagog:-so-lastnosti-ucitelja-pomembne This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of motor skill development programs delivered by kinesiologists and generalist teachers in elementary school. Methods: A quasiexperimental design was used in which 79 primary school students aged 9 to 11 years participated. The participants were divided into a control group (n=36) taught by generalist teachers and an experimental group (n=43) taught by kinesiologists. Both groups were assessed on their abilities in five motor skills: forward roll, backward roll, 40-meter sprint, squat and hip hinge. The assessments were conducted at baseline and after a three-month intervention period. Results: In the experimental group, led by kinesiologists, there were statistically significant improvements in all the motor skills assessed. Scores for the 40-metre sprint increased from 3.60 to 4.01, for squats from 3.63 to 4.12, for backward rolls from 3.13 to 3.68, for forward rolls from 3.36 to 3.90, and for hips from 3.09 to 3.85 (all p<0.01). In the control group, which was taught by generalist teachers, only the 40-metre sprint improved significantly (from 3.49 to 3.85, p=0.01). Discussion: The results suggest that the specialized training and techniques of kinesiologists are more effective in promoting motor skill acquisition in primary school students than traditional methods used by generalist teachers. This emphasizes the potential for integrating kinesiologists into school physical education. Conclusions: Integrating kinesiologists into the physical education curriculum significantly enhances motor skill acquisition and argues for a reevaluation of current educational strategies to include professional kinesiology expertise.

Language:English
Keywords:motor skill acquisition, kinesiology, physical education, primary school, pedagogical strategies
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2025
Number of pages:Str. 84-99
Numbering:Vol. 31, no. 1
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-168896 This link opens in a new window
UDC:37.011.3-051
ISSN on article:1318-2269
DOI:10.52165/kinsi.31.1.84-99 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:234861315 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:06.05.2025
Views:440
Downloads:82
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Kinesiologia Slovenica : scientific journal on sport
Shortened title:Kinesiol. Slov.
Publisher:University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Sport = Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za šport
ISSN:1318-2269
COBISS.SI-ID:30681856 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-SA 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Description:This Creative Commons license is very similar to the regular Attribution license, but requires the release of all derivative works under this same license.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Title:Učitelj razrednega pouka ali športni pedagog : so lastnosti učitelja pomembne?
Abstract:
Namen: Cilj raziskave je bil oceniti primerjalno učinkovitost programov za razvoj gibalnih sposobnosti, ki jih izvajajo kineziologi in učitelji razrednega pouka. Metode: V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 79 osnovnošolskih učencev, starih 9–11 let. Razdeljeni so bili v kontrolno skupino (n=36), ki so jo poučevali učitelji razrednega pouka, in eksperimentalno skupino (n=43), ki so jo poučevali kineziologi. Obema skupinama smo s petimi testi ocenili gibalno učinkovitost: preval naprej, preval nazaj, 40-metrski šprint, počep in upogib bokov. Ocenjevanja so potekala teden dni pred in teden dni po zaključku trimesečnega intervencijskega obdobja. Rezultati: V eksperimentalni skupini, ki so jo vodili kineziologi, so se statistično značilno izboljšale vse ocenjene gibalne sposobnosti Rezultati za 40-metrski šprint so se izboljšali s 3,60 na 4,01, za počepe s 3,63 na 4,12, za preval nazaj s 3,13 na 3,68, za preval naprej s 3,36 na 3,90, in za upogib bokov s 3,09 na 3,85 (vsi p<0.01). V kontrolni skupini, ki so jo poučevali učitelji razrednega pouka, se je statistično značilno izboljšal le 40-metrski šprint (s 3,49 na 3,85, p=0.01). Diskusija: Rezultati so pokazali, da so specializirano usposabljanje in različne učne metode kineziologov učinkovitejše pri izboljševanju gibalnih sposobnosti pri osnovnošolskih učencih v primerjavi s tradicionalnimi učnimi metodami, ki jih uporabljajo učitelji razrednega pouka. Rezultati poudarjajo potencial za integracijo kineziologov v šolski predmet šport. Zaključek: Integracija kineziologov v učne ure športa lahko znatno izboljša gibalne sposobnosti učencev, zato bi bilo priporočljivo, da se strokovno znanje kineziologije sistematično vključi v učni načrt predmeta šport.

Keywords:gibalne sposobnosti, kineziologija, predmet šport, osnovna šola, učne metode

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back