Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Comparison of increase in masticatory efficiency between removable partial dentures retained with clasps and retained with attachments
ID
Dula, Linda J.
(
Author
),
ID
Shala, Kujtim Sh.
(
Author
),
ID
Štubljar, David
(
Author
),
ID
Starc, Andrej
(
Author
),
ID
Kosumi, Shera
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(470,64 KB)
MD5: A6433324E1D1A36560EEF5DB61888DC7
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70130
Image galllery
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the masticatory efficiency of removable partial dentures (RPDs) retained with clasps versus those retained with attachments. Material and Methods: A total of 107 patients fitted with 138 RPDs participated in the study; 87 RPDs (63.0%) were clasp‐retained, and 51 RPDs (37.0%) were attachment‐retained. Subjects chewed 5.0 g of peanuts for 30 s, and masticatory efficiency was measured using a spectrophotometer at an absorption rate of 590 µm. Measurements were taken before insertion, immediately after, and 1 and 3 months post‐insertion of RPDs. Results: The analysis revealed progressive masticatory efficiency improvements for both clasp‐retained and attachment‐retained RPDs over time, with significant enhancements observed at the 3‐month post‐insertion mark. Initially, clasp-retained RPDs showed slightly higher efficiency than attachment‐retained RPDs; however, attachment‐retained RPDs demonstrated superior efficiency after 3 months (p = 0.001). Consistent improvements were noted across different denture support types, with Triangular and Quadrangular supports showing the most notable gains by 3 months (p ≤ 0.006). GLMM analysis underscored the significant impact of time on masticatory efficiency (F(3, 511) = 4.926, p = 0.002), with no significant effects attributed to RPD type or support type alone, nor any significant interaction effects, indicating a universal improvement in masticatory function over time regardless of RPD design. Conclusions: RPD insertion significantly improves masticatory efficiency, particularly evident 3 months post‐insertion, with attachment-retained RPDs outperforming clasp‐retained types. Improvements in masticatory function over time are consistent across all RPD designs, unaffected by denture type or support structure. This emphasizes the role of denture design in both immediate adaptation and long‐term treatment success, suggesting that time significantly contributes to enhanced masticatory efficiency regardless of RPD design, highlighting the importance of tailored prosthetic rehabilitation.
Language:
English
Keywords:
removable partial dentures
,
masticatory efficiency
,
attachment clasp
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
ZF - Faculty of Health Sciences
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2025
Year:
2025
Number of pages:
11 str.
Numbering:
Vol. 11, iss. 2, art. e70130
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-168745
UDC:
616.31
ISSN on article:
2057-4347
DOI:
10.1002/cre2.70130
COBISS.SI-ID:
233520131
Publication date in RUL:
23.04.2025
Views:
273
Downloads:
151
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Clinical and experimental dental research
Shortened title:
Clin. exp. dent. res.
Publisher:
Wiley
ISSN:
2057-4347
COBISS.SI-ID:
525818905
Licences
License:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:
This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back