Details

Ustavnopravni vidiki "lažnih novic"
ID Rogelj, Ana (Author), ID Bardutzky, Samo (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,42 MB)
MD5: B8CF96482B6F91855487FB83A4128511

Abstract
Lažne novice in dezinformacije so eden izmed ključnih izzivov sodobne družbe. Magistrsko delo preučuje definicije lažnih novic in dezinformacij, ki se v literaturi, povezani s problematiko napačnih informacij, najpogosteje pojavljajo. Ker so definicije pojma lažne novice in dezinformacije izjemno široke, premalo natančne in kot take niso primerne za uporabo v pravu, ampak so uporabljive zgolj v političnem kontekstu, magistrsko delo ponudi nov pojem: »lažne informacije«, ki ga definira kot: »V bistvenem napačne trditve o dejstvih na internetu, ki lahko ogrozijo svobodne volitve, zdravje ter življenje ljudi.« Magistrsko delo nadalje preuči možne ukrepe boja proti lažnim informacijam, to so ukrep popravljanja lažnih informacij, ukrep odstranjevanja ali blokiranja lažne vsebine in kazenskopravne sankcije, pri čemer se podrobneje usmeri v ukrep kazenskopravne narave, ki lahko edini prepreči nastanek lažnih informacij. S tem namenom magistrsko delo oblikuje določbo kazenskega zakonika, ki prepoveduje objavo ali širjenje napačnih informacij na internetu, ki lahko ogrozijo zdravje in življenje ljudi ali svobodne volitve v Republiki Sloveniji. Magistrsko delo oblikovano kazensko določbo podvrže presoji ustavnosti z vidika 2. in 39. člena Ustave Republike Slovenije, v okviru postopka ocene ustavnosti, ki ga opravlja Ustavno sodišče Republike Slovenije. Magistrsko delo ugotovi, da taka določba ni v neskladju z 2. členom, je pa v neskladju z 39. členom Ustave Republike Slovenije. Določba je sicer primerna in nujna, a je nesorazmerna za dosego legitimnega cilja. Vzpostavitev kazenske odgovornosti torej ni ustrezen ukrep boja proti lažnim informacijam.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:lažne novice, dezinformacije, lažne informacije, internet, zdravje in življenje ljudi, svobodne volitve, svoboda izražanja, prepoved
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2025
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-168560 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:233280259 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:17.04.2025
Views:521
Downloads:107
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Constitutional and legal aspects of "fake news"
Abstract:
Fake news and disinformation are one of the key challenges of modern society. This master's thesis examines the definitions of fake news and disinformation that appear most frequently in the literature related to the issue of false information. As the definitions of fake news and disinformation are extremely broad, lack precision and are as such not suitable for use in law, but are only applicable in a political context, this master’s thesis proposes a new concept: ‘fake information’, which it defines as:‘Materially false claims of fact on the internet that can threaten free elections, health and human life.’ The master's thesis further examines the possible measures to combat fake information, i.e. the measure of correcting false information, the measure of removing or blocking false content and criminal sanctions, focusing in more detail on the criminal law measure, which is the only one that can prevent the creation of fake information. To this end, the master's thesis formulates a provision of the Criminal Code that prohibits the publication or dissemination of fake information on the internet that may endanger the health and life of people or the free elections in the Republic of Slovenia. The master's thesis subjects the drafted criminal provision to a constitutionality assessment in the light of Articles 2 and 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, in the framework of the procedure for the review of the constitutionality carried out by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia. The master's thesis concludes that such a provision is not incompatible with Article 2, but is incompatible with Article 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. The provision, while appropriate and necessary, is disproportionate to the legitimate aim pursued. The introduction of criminal liability is therefore not an appropriate measure to combat false information.

Keywords:fake news, disinformation, fake information, internet, human health and life, free elections, freedom of expression, prohibition

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back