Details

Vključevanje odmorov, namenjenih gibanju, v delovni in pedagoški proces : magistrsko delo
ID Ocvirk, Ana (Author), ID Štemberger Vučko, Vesna (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,44 MB)
MD5: AF34AD9E27DC65797B1C0572E6169868

Abstract
Problem magistrskega dela je osredotočen na raziskovanje vključevanja gibanja v pedagoški in delovni proces v osnovnih šolah. Poudarek je na proučevanju, ali in v kakšni meri učitelji izvajajo odmore, namenjene gibanju, na kakšen način jih vključujejo ter kako pogosto se to dogaja. Prav tako je pomembno razumeti razloge, ki vplivajo na odločitve učiteljev glede izvajanja ali neizvajanja teh odmorov, tako v okviru njihovega poučevanja kot tudi v njihovem lastnem delovnem procesu. V magistrskem delu smo uporabili kvantitativno raziskavo, pri čemer smo podatke zbirali z anketnim vprašalnikom. Za raziskovanje smo uporabili deskriptivno raziskovalno metodo in kavzalno raziskovalno metodo. Vzorec je neslučajnostni in namenski, sestavljen iz 222 učiteljev iz slovenskih osnovnih šol. Uporabili smo naslednje statistične postopke: frekvenčno in odstotkovno porazdelitev, hi-kvadrat preizkus (Pearsonov hi-kvadrat test), Kullbackov 2Ȋ-preizkus ter izračun povprečja, aritmetične sredine, minimalnih in maksimalnih vrednosti. Rezultati raziskave so pokazali: − da večina učiteljev učencem omogoča gibalno aktivne odmore, medtem ko jih 10 % tega ne izvaja; − da dve tretjini učiteljev vključuje gibalne odmore tudi v svoj delovni proces, predvsem za sprostitev in zmanjšanje negativnih učinkov sedenja; − da so glavni razlogi za neizvajanje gibalno aktivnih odmorov pomanjkanje časa, prepričanje, da ne sodijo v akademski svet, in odsotnost podpore nadrejenih; − da razredni učitelji pogosteje izvajajo gibalno aktivne odmore kot predmetni učitelji; − da pozitivni učinki gibanja vključujejo povečano koncentracijo učencev, zmanjšanje stresa, izboljšano produktivnost in boljšo socialno dinamiko; − da so najpogostejše ovire pri izvajanju gibalnih odmorov pomanjkanje materialne podpore, potreba po dodatnih usposabljanjih in nezavedanje pomena gibanja.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:gibanje, gibalno aktivni odmori, pedagoški proces, delovni proces, telesna dejavnost, učitelji, učenci, osnovne šole
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:A. Ocvirk
Year:2025
Number of pages:VII, 76 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-168556 This link opens in a new window
UDC:796:373.3(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:233358595 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:17.04.2025
Views:389
Downloads:139
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Incorporating Movement Breaks into the Work and Educational Process
Abstract:
The problem of the master's thesis focuses on researching the integration of movement into the pedagogical and work processes in primary schools. The emphasis is on examining whether and to what extent teachers implement breaks intended for physical activity, how they incorporate them, and how frequently this occurs. It is also important to understand the reasons influencing teachers' decisions regarding the implementation or non-implementation of such breaks, both within their teaching and their own work process. The master's thesis employs a quantitative research approach, with data collected through a survey questionnaire. Descriptive and causal research methods were used for the study. The sample is non-random and purposive, consisting of 222 teachers from Slovenian primary schools. The following statistical procedures were applied: frequency and percentage distribution, Chi-square test (Pearson’s Chi-square test), Kullback’s 2Ȋ test, as well as calculations of mean, arithmetic mean, minimum, and maximum values. The research results indicate: − that most teachers provide students with physically active breaks, while 10% do not; − that two-thirds of teachers also incorporate movement breaks into their own work routine, primarily for relaxation and to reduce the negative effects of prolonged sitting; − that the main reasons for not implementing movement breaks include lack of time, the belief that they do not belong in the academic setting, and the absence of support from superiors; − that primary school teachers implement movement breaks more frequently than subject teachers; − that the positive effects of movement include increased student concentration, stress reduction, improved productivity, and enhanced social dynamics; − that the most common barriers to implementing movement breaks are a lack of material support, the need for additional training, and a lack of awareness about the importance of movement.

Keywords:movement, physically active breaks, pedagogical process, work process, physical activity, teachers, students

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back