The thesis examines the the concepts of administrative finality and finality in administrative proceedings, their significance, legal consequences, and the possibilities for interference with both. Administrative finality comes when an administrative decision can no longer be challenged by an appeal, while finality is attained when no judicial remedy is available against an administratively final decision. A party may exercise their rights from administrative decision upon administrative finality, whereas finality provides greater legal certainty by solidifying the legal relationship.
The research is based on descriptive, analytical, mixed, and normative-dogmatic methods to present the legal framework and case law regarding these institutes. By analyzing case law and administrative statistics, the thesis explores the rationale behind administrative finality and finality, as well as the circumstances under which interference is possible.
Administrative finality ensures enforceability unless an appeal has a non-suspensive effect. An appeal delays administrative finality until a ruling is issued. While judicial remedies allow challenges to administrative finality, extraordinary legal remedies may affect both administrative finality and finality. Interference in a final decision is permitted only in exceptional cases explicitly prescribed by law.
Thesis provides a comprehensive overview of administrative finality and finality in administrative law through an analysis of legislation, case law, and legal doctrine. The findings may contribute to evaluating the functioning of administrative authorities, particularly regarding the necessity and frequency of interference in administratively final and final decisions.
|
