Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
What kind of pluralism do we need in economics?
ID
Kešeljević, Aleksandar
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(175,78 KB)
MD5: D2E862BE8DEE29CD19E6C2AA52CA34EC
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/intellectual-economics/article/view/7539
Image galllery
Abstract
Purpose. This article highlights the notion that methodological normativism of the neoclassical school has consolidated its monopoly position within economics, and significantly reduces our social reality by understanding the economic system as a closed system. The author aims to show that such a misleading picture of the world leads to one single best epistemology, theory, methodology and educational system within economics. Design/Methodology/Approach. The author explains complaints against such an approach in terms of five different kinds of interrelated and interdependent pluralisms. The comparative and documentary methods ensure maximum openness with regard to the collection of theoretical and empirical papers. The qualitative analysis of “pro et contra” debate is based on a questionnaire completed by students. Findings. The author believes that understanding different types of pluralism and their interconnectedness is the most appropriate approach to inquiry and teaching in economics. Epistemological pluralism logically follows from ontological by allowing a relatively separate system of paradigms to co-exist as a necessary counterpart to the plurality of the social world. In debates, the author strives for a limited range of complementary theoreti- cal approaches with meaningful methodological standards in order for students to obtain a more anthropocentric and less dogmatic view of the world. Originality. There have been few attempts to show deeper interdependence among various types of pluralism. The current study addresses this gap in the literature. The testimonials of students show the usefulness of “pro et contra” debate in introducing and promoting more pluralism into the educational process.
Language:
English
Keywords:
methodological normativism
,
pluralism
,
debate
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
EF - School of Economics and Business
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2023
Number of pages:
Str. 240-259
Numbering:
Vol. 17, no. 2
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-167419
UDC:
33
ISSN on article:
1822-8038
DOI:
10.13165/IE-23-17-2-01
COBISS.SI-ID:
179251715
Publication date in RUL:
20.02.2025
Views:
628
Downloads:
165
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Intelektine ekonomika
Shortened title:
Intelekt. ekon.
Publisher:
Mykolas Romeris University
ISSN:
1822-8038
COBISS.SI-ID:
519536665
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:
The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
ekonomija
,
pluralizem
,
methodology
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back