Details

Large heterogeneity in biosecurity legislation in the intensive pig production across Europe
ID Biebaut, E. (Author), ID Štukelj, Marina (Author), ID Chantziaras, Ilias (Author), ID Pina Nunes, T. (Author), ID Nedosekov, V. (Author), ID Gomes, Carla Correia (Author), ID Mehmedi, B. (Author), ID Corrégé, I. (Author), ID Ozsvari, Laszlo (Author), ID Svennesen, L. (Author), ID Prodanov-Radulović, Jasna (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,65 MB)
MD5: 0DEB855F6F82DD7D30A1DC3882B06346
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725000248?via%3Dihub This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Implementing biosecurity measures in the pig production is crucial to optimize animal health and reduce antimicrobial usage. A legal framework may help to ensure all stakeholders understand the need of biosecurity measures and to implement them correctly. Limited knowledge is available about how implementation of biosecurity measures is regulated in European countries. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify which biosecurity measures were mandatory by national legislation and/or by pig sector organizations of European countries for the intensive pig production under normal circumstances (i.e. no (threat of) disease outbreaks). A questionnaire including 51 biosecurity measures, 32 on external and 19 on internal, was developed and sent to national country representatives. Twenty-four European countries, of which 18 belonging to the European Union, indicated which biosecurity measures were mandatory by law. Four countries, France, Spain, Italy and Romania had a single national pig-specific biosecurity legislation, while in the other countries multiple legislations had to be consulted to complete the questionnaire. In general, there was a high heterogeneity in the number of measures that were mandatory by law per country. Most biosecurity measures addressed in the national legislation focused on external biosecurity and were measures that can be easily audited when conducting a farm visit such as the presence of a hygiene lock, fencing around the farm and the existence of documentation. A significant (p < 0.001) positive correlation was observed between the presence of external and internal biosecurity measures in the legislation. Yet, no significant association was observed between the number of biosecurity measures present in the national legislation and the size of the pig production. Fourteen countries indicated which biosecurity measures were required by pig sector organizations for intensive pig farms. The median number of biosecurity measures mandatory by pig sector organizations but not by law was 13 with a minimum of one measure in Germany and a maximum of 24 in Croatia. Different countries apply different strategies to increase the level of biosecurity. Further research is needed to investigate the impact of the different strategies on the implementation of biosecurity on intensive pig farms in the countries.

Language:English
Keywords:biosecurity measures, disease protection, intensive pig production, law, mapping
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:VF - Veterinary Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Publication date:01.01.2025
Year:2025
Number of pages:9 str.
Numbering:Vol. 237, [article no.] 106439
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-166908 This link opens in a new window
UDC:636:636.5
ISSN on article:1873-1716
DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106439 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:224430083 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:30.01.2025
Views:461
Downloads:664
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Preventive veterinary medicine
Shortened title:Prev. vet. med.
Publisher:Elsevier BV
ISSN:1873-1716
COBISS.SI-ID:191670787 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Projects

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:COST Action Better
Project number:CA20103

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:HE
Project number:101083923
Name:Enhanced and cost-effective biosecurity in livestock production
Acronym:BioSecure

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back