Details

Pravna ureditev in upravno-sodna praksa dostopa do informacij javnega značaja v Sloveniji : diplomsko delo
ID Bučar, Nastja (Author), ID Kovač, Polonca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (865,69 KB)
MD5: 90DEBD79B452959BCA115C5EB094F98F

Abstract
Dostop do informacij, s katerimi razpolagajo državni in druge z oblastjo povezane institucije, je ena izmed ključnih državljanskih in demokratičnih pridobitev, saj je s tem omogočeno sodelovanje ter neposreden nadzor družbe nad delovanjem oblasti. V Sloveniji njeni začetki segajo v leto 1991 s sprejetjem Ustave Republike Slovenije. Učinkovito izvajanje ustavno zagotovljene pravice pa ni bilo možno vse do leta 2003, ko je Državni zbor RS sprejel Zakon o dostopu do informacij javnega značaja. Za učinkovito izvajanje te pravice je namreč treba imeti natančno določen postopek in način izvrševanja ter zagotovljeno pravno varstvo. V diplomskem delu so bili preučevani relevantni predpisi, letna poročila, sodna praksa Informacijskega pooblaščenca in relevantna literatura. S tem smo želeli podroben vpogled, kako se zakon izvaja v praksi IP in sodišč. Iz rezultatov diplomskega dela je mogoče ugotoviti, da zakon v praksi predstavlja pomembno orodje za zagotavljanje transparentnosti in odgovornosti javnega sektorja. Kljub jasno določenim normativnim okvirjem so opazna določena odstopanja pri njegovem izvajanju, zlasti v primerih, ko zavezanci ne razkrivajo dolžnega ali celo molčijo glede vloženih zahtev za dostop do informacij. Največjo težavo zavezancem pri izvajanju predstavljajo obrazložitve izjem, saj so te zelo široko in presplošno razložene. Iz tega so možne jasne izboljšave na področju dostopa do IJZ in ravnanja zavezancev z zahtevo.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:informacije javnega značaja, Informacijski pooblaščenec, izjeme, pritožba, sodna praksa, raba ZUP
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[N. Bučar]
Year:2024
Number of pages:IX, 39 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-165398 This link opens in a new window
UDC:347.9:342.7:3.077.3:347.9(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:218131971 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:05.12.2024
Views:486
Downloads:96
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Legal regulation, administrative practice and case-low on access to public administration in Slovenia
Abstract:
Access to information held by state institutions and other entities associated with public authority is one of the fundamental achievements of citizenship and democracy, enabling public participation and direct oversight of governmental operations. In Slovenia, the origins of this right can be traced back to 1991 with the adoption of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia. However, the effective implementation of this constitutionally guaranteed right was not realized until 2003, when the National Assembly adopted the Access to Public Information Act. The effective exercise of this right requires a clearly defined procedure, execution method, and guaranteed legal protection. The thesis examined relevant regulations, annual reports, case law from the Information Commissioner, and pertinent literature to gain a detailed understanding of how the Act is applied in practice by the Information Commissioner and the courts. The findings indicate that the Act serves as a significant tool for ensuring transparency and accountability in the public sector. Despite a well-defined normative framework, certain discrepancies in its application are evident, particularly in cases where obligated entities fail to disclose required information or remain silent on submitted access requests. The greatest challenge for obligated entities lies in justifying exceptions, which are often interpreted too broadly and vaguely. These findings highlight clear opportunities for improvement in the area of access to public information and the handling of requests by obligated entities.

Keywords:public information, Information Commissioner, exceptions, appeal, case law, application of the GAPA

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back