Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Advanced
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
A systematic literature review on overconfidence and related biases Influencing Investment Decision Making
ID
Karki, Uttam
(
Author
),
ID
Bhatia, Vaneet
(
Author
),
ID
Sharma, Dheeraj
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(924,75 KB)
MD5: FF15E93280FFCF122E97B5EB0AB9FB4D
URL - Source URL, Visit
https://www.ebrjournal.net/home/vol26/iss2/4/
Image galllery
Abstract
In the current market scenario, it has been observed that biases are among the most significant factors influencing investment decisions. Among these biases, overconfidence is a common phenomenon managers tend to exhibit while making decisions. To understand the role of overconfidence bias in investment decision making, this study thoroughly scrutinizes and consolidates the current research on overconfidence bias. To achieve the objective, this study performs a systematic review of literature utilizing the PRISMA approach and examines 92 journal articles published in the last 20 years. Results suggest that the other two biases—hindsight and confirmation—are related to overconfidence bias. In addi- tion, the review suggests that biases result in three major outcomes. The first, positive, aspect pertains to the promotion of mental well-being and significant allocation to research and development investments. Conversely, the second, negative, aspect involves the manipulation of operating cash flow, which tends to diminish the value of shareholders. Third, there is a preference for internal financing over external financing options. Furthermore, the research also suggests factors that may overcome the influence of the overconfidence bias. This study demonstrates its originality through thematic analysis, which effectively examines multiple dimensions of biases. Moreover, incorporating these research findings can enhance managerial decision-making processes, promote more objective assessments, and ultimately improve the overall quality of investment choices.
Language:
English
Keywords:
enterprises
,
investments
,
decision making
,
literature review
,
overconfidence bias
,
confirmation bias
,
hindsight bias
,
investment decision making
,
managerial decision making
,
investment biases
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.02 - Review Article
Organization:
EF - School of Economics and Business
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
Str. 130-150
Numbering:
Vol. 26, iss. 2, article no. 4
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-164813
UDC:
658
ISSN on article:
2335-4216
DOI:
10.15458/2335-4216.1338
COBISS.SI-ID:
200328451
Publication date in RUL:
13.11.2024
Views:
717
Downloads:
324
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Economic and business review
Publisher:
Ekonomska fakulteta
ISSN:
2335-4216
COBISS.SI-ID:
268649216
Licences
License:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Link:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Description:
The most restrictive Creative Commons license. This only allows people to download and share the work for no commercial gain and for no other purposes.
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Keywords:
podjetje
,
investicije
,
odločanje
,
pregled literature
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Collection
This document is a part of these collections:
Economic and business review
Back