izpis_h1_title_alt

Sistematični pregled literature in metaanaliza učinkov vitamina D v nosečnosti
ID Kornhauzer, Lara (Author), ID Mravljak, Janez (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,17 MB)
MD5: 0E772CF03A26F448CDCC5F7F418D92BE

Abstract
Nosečnost in z njo povezane spremembe so normalen fiziološki proces kot odziv na razvoj ploda. Te spremembe se zgodijo kot odziv na številne dejavnike; hormonske spremembe, povečanje skupnega volumna krvi, povečanje telesne mase in povečanje velikosti ploda. Preskrbljenost z vitaminom D je bistvenega pomena za zdravje matere in ploda med nosečnostjo ter preprečevanje nezaželenih izidov. Pomanjkanje vitamina D med nosečnostjo je lahko povezano s preeklampsijo, inzulinsko rezistenco, gestacijskim diabetesom mellitusom, prezgodnjim porodom in poporodno depresijo. Zanimalo nas je, kakšna je povezava med dodajanjem vitamina D in zmanjšanim tveganjem za nastanek neugodnih izidov v nosečnosti ter dodatkom vitamina D v povezavi s koncentracijo le-tega v krvi. Lotili smo se izvedbe sistematičnega pregleda po priporočenih postavkah poročanja za sistematične preglede in metaanalizne protokole. Literaturo smo poiskali v podatkovnih bazah: PubMed, Web of Science in v Google Učenjaku. Na podlagi vseh opredeljenih kriterijev smo na koncu izbrali 25 najustreznejših člankov. Kakovost študij smo ocenili s kontrolnim seznamom za randomizirane kontrolirane študije, objavljenim s strani Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Vse študije smo analizirali in podatke skupaj s kratkim povzetkom zbrali v preglednici. 22 študij smo vključili v metaanalizo, ostale 3 smo vsebinsko primerjali. Metaanalizo smo izvedli v programu Review Manager, rezultate prikazali v obliki drevesnih diagramov, velikost učinka pa izrazili kot standardizirano povprečno razliko med skupino, ki je prejemala vitamin D in skupino, ki je prejemala placebo. Metaanalizo smo izvedli za koncentracijo vitamina D, spremembo koncentracije vitamina D, glukozo v plazmi na tešče, indeks odpornosti proti inzulinu, inzulin, krvni tlak, porodno težo novorojenčka, preeklampsijo, gestacijski diabetes in prezgodnji porod. Za dodatno preglednost smo v metaanalizi ločili še 3 podskupine, in sicer: zdravo populacijo nosečnic; nosečnice z gestacijskim diabetesom in nosečnice, ki imajo indeks telesne mase ≥ 29. Ugotovili smo statistično pomembno razliko med eksperimentalno in kontrolno skupino pri koncentraciji vitamina D, krvnem tlaku in porodni teži novorojenčka. Tudi število neželenih izidov nosečnosti, kot so preeklampsija, gestacijski diabetes in prezgodnji porod, je bilo večje v kontrolni skupini v primerjavi s skupino, ki je prejemala vitamin D. Predlagamo izvedbo nadaljnjih raziskav pri nosečnicah, pri čemer bi bilo dobro standardizirati raziskovalne metode. V naši nalogi je zaradi heterogenosti raziskav precej neenotnih rezultatov in posledično negotovih ugotovitev.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:vitamin D, pomanjkanje vitamina D, nosečnost, metaanaliza, neželeni izidi
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-164534 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:30.10.2024
Views:70
Downloads:45
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Systematic review and meta-analysis of vitamin D effects in pregnancy
Abstract:
Pregnancy and the associated changes are a normal physiological processes in response to fetal development. These changes are a response to numerous factors: hormonal changes, an increase in total blood volume, weight gain, and an increase in fetal size. Vitamin D sufficiency during pregnancy is essential for the health of both the mother and the fetus, as well as for the prevention of adverse outcomes. Vitamin D deficiency, on the other hand, may be associated with pre-eclampsia, insulin resistance, gestational diabetes mellitus, premature birth, and postpartum depression. We were intrigued by the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and reduced risk of adverse outcomes in pregnancy, as well as the correlation between vitamin D supplementation and its concentration in the blood. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the recommended reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We searched for literature in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. After applying all criteria, we ultimately selected 25 relevant articles. We evaluated the quality of the studies using a checklist for randomized controlled trials published by the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. We analyzed all studies and, along with a brief summary, compiled the data in a table. We included 22 studies in the meta-analysis, while the remaining 3 were compared thematically. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Review Manager software. The results were shown in the form of forest plots, and the effect size was expressed as standardized average differences between the group that supplemented with vitamin D and the placebo group. We performed the meta-analysis for vitamin D concentration, changes in vitamin D concentration, fasting plasma glucose, insulin resistance index, insulin, blood pressure, birth weight of the newborn, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and premature birth. For additional clarity, we further divided the meta-analysis into three subgroups: healthy pregnant women, pregnant women with gestational diabetes, and pregnant women with a body mass index ≥ 29. We found that the effect of vitamin D compared to placebo was statistically significant for vitamin D concentration, blood pressure, and birth weight of the newborn. The number of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes, and premature birth, was also higher in the placebo group compared to the group supplementing with vitamin D. We recommend conducting further research on pregnant women, with an emphasis on standardizing research methods. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, our findings were quite inconsistent, leading to uncertain conclusions.

Keywords:vitamin D, vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy, meta-analysis, adverse outcomes

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back