izpis_h1_title_alt

Pravice narave in mednarodno pravo
ID Lancoš, Gaja (Author), ID Kovič Dine, Maša (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (984,58 KB)
MD5: 6760AA8ED38D67EB8BED2070B83E732C

Abstract
Podeljevanje pravic naravi predstavlja relativno nov koncept v mednarodnem okoljskem pravu. Zagovorniki pravic narave opozarjajo na potrebo po temeljitem premisleku o ontologiji okoljskega prava, ki od sedanjega antropocentričnega pristopa zahteva odmik k novi, drugačni ontologiji, ki temelji na spoznanju o medsebojni povezanosti in prirejenosti človeka ter narave. Menijo, da šele s priznanjem, da narava ni le vir, ki ga lahko človek izkorišča, temveč entiteta s pravicami, lahko začnemo graditi bolj pravično, trajnostno in uravnoteženo družbo, ki stremi k harmoničnemu sobivanju z naravo. Podeljevanje pravic naravi temelji na globlji spremembi (zahodnih) vrednot. Eden od ključnih prispevkov k razvoju pravic narave prihaja iz kultur avtohtonih ljudstev, ki že stoletja živijo v skladu z načeli ekocentričnega sobivanja in ostajajo globalna vodilna sila za priznavanje pravic naravi. Koncept podeljevanja pravic naravi teži k obravnavi narave oz. določenih naravnih entitet kot pravnih subjektov, ki imajo izvirne pravice do obstoja, razvoja in obnove. Koncept še ni povsem ideološko dodelan, vendar nam primeri implementacije po celem svetu kažejo, da ni zgolj teoretičen. Pobude za pravice narave najdemo tudi v (nezavezujočih) mednarodnih dokumentih, kot so Svetovna listina za naravo in Deklaracija o pravicah matere Zemlje, ki dajejo smernice za nadaljnji razvoj, vendar pa je zaradi kompleksnosti pravnih sistemov prehod k ekocentričnemu pravnemu urejanju otežen. Vključuje namreč potrebo po usklajevanju različnih pravnih, kulturnih in političnih okvirjev, hkrati pa se je potrebno prilagajati globalnim okoljskim izzivom in potrebam prihodnjih generacij. Vprašanja, kot so izvršljivost pravic narave, njihova skladnost s človekovimi pravicami in njihova integracija v obstoječe pravne sisteme, ostajajo odprta.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:pravice narave, mednarodno okoljsko pravo, antropocentrizem, ekocentrizem, okoljske pravice, Svetovna listina za naravo, Splošna deklaracija o pravicah matere Zemlje
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:PF - Faculty of Law
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-162692 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:209817859 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:26.09.2024
Views:155
Downloads:29
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Rights of nature and international law
Abstract:
The conferral of rights to nature is a relatively new concept in international environmental law. Advocates of the rights of nature emphasize the need for a thorough reconsideration of the ontology of environmental law, advocating a divergence from the prevailing anthropocentric approach toward a novel, alternative ontology grounded in recognition of the interconnectedness and interdependence of humans and nature. They argue that only by acknowledging nature not merely as a resource for human exploitation but as an entity vested with rights can we begin to build a more just, sustainable, and balanced society that strives for harmonious coexistence with the natural world. The conferral of rights to nature is rooted in a deeper transformation of (Western) values. A significant contribution to the development of the rights of nature stems from Indigenous cultures, which have, for centuries, adhered to principles of ecocentric coexistence and remain a leading global force in the recognition of these rights. The concept of the rights of nature seeks to recognize nature, or specific natural entities, as legal subjects vested with inherent rights to exist, develop, and regenerate. While the concept is not yet fully ideologically developed, examples of its implementation around the world demonstrate that it is not merely of theoretical value. Initiatives advocating for the rights of nature are also reflected in non-binding international instruments, such as the World Charter for Nature and the Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth, which guide further development. However, the transition to ecocentric legal frameworks is impeded by the inherent complexity of legal systems, necessitating the harmonization of diverse legal, cultural, and political frameworks, while also requiring adaptation to global environmental challenges and the needs of future generations. The key issues, such as the enforceability of the rights of nature, their compatibility with human rights, and their integration into existing legal systems, have yet to be resolved.

Keywords:Rights of Nature, international environmental law, anthropocentrism, ecocentrism, environmental rights, World Charter for Nature, Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back