Neurogenic communication disorders can have a significant impact on the daily functioning and quality of life of those affected. Worldwide, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) is often used in the diagnostic process to recognize the impact of disease or impairment on a person's functioning, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of the individual. This approach enables the person to participate in setting rehabilitation goals that are important to them, thereby directing treatment towards achieving the highest possible quality of life for them. Slovenian speech and language pathologists lack diagnostic tools for evaluating communication-related quality of life. The aim of the study was to translate and adapt The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Quality of Communication Life Scale (ASHA-QCL) and to investigate the measurement properties of the Slovenian adaptation (QCL-SI). Patients of URI Soča and members of associations related to cerebrovascular disease, Parkinson's disease and acquired brain injury were invited to participate in the study. The data collection, conducted from May to November 2023, involved a sample of 51 adults of both genders aged 18 and above with a-/dysphasia (n = 33), ana-/dysarthria (n = 16), cognitive-communication disorder (n = 1) and a-/dysphonia (n = 1). The content validity of the QCL-SI was assessed by a panel of experts. Construct validity analysis revealed that all items (excluding I5, answered by only five participants) only loaded under one factor. The QCL-SI with 17 items (excluding I5) showed a high internal consistency (α = 0.894; n = 48) and high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.966, p < 0.05). The discriminatory power is adequate with a coefficient of variation of 19.7%, and item discrimination indices are high (r > 0.400), except for I4, I15, and I16, which are lower but still acceptable (r > 0.200). A moderate positive correlation was found between the average score of items I1 to I17, which relate specifically to communication-related quality of life, and item I18, which relates to overall quality of life (rS = 0.698, p = 0.000). This result indicates that QCL-SI is indeed intended for assessing a specific aspect of quality of life – communication – and not quality of life in general. There were no statistically significant differences in the scale results based on gender, age, education level, or type of communication disorder. With the QCL-SI, Slovenian speech and language pathologists have gained an assessment tool with which they can gain insight into the subjective experience of a communication disorder and evaluate the progress of therapy, which is an important step towards holistic care with a focus on improving quality of life.
|