izpis_h1_title_alt

Odzivanje centrov za socialno delo v poplavah 2023 v Sloveniji
ID Jurečič, Lora Ana (Author), ID Gril, Alenka (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (3,55 MB)
MD5: F7A0B3F9FF40EA952DE595301C37AFB0

Abstract
Diplomska naloga zajema temo odzivanja centrov za socialno delo po poplavah, ki so bile v avgustu leta 2023 v Sloveniji. Način odzivanja po poplavah za saniranje škode je ključnega pomena, saj so te ene izmed najbolj pogostih in uničujočih naravnih nesreč v Sloveniji. Raziskovala sem, kako so se centri za socialno delo odzvali takoj po poplavah in kako so se odzvali en mesec po poplavah, kakšne potrebe ljudi so prepoznali socialni delavci kot posledico poplav, kakšne ovire so imeli socialni delavci v nudenju pomoči po poplavah, kako so sodelovali centri za socialno delo z drugimi organizacijami po poplavah in kaj želijo socialni delavci izboljšati na centrih za socialno delo v primeru dela po poplavah. Raziskava je kvalitativna, pri kateri sem pridobila podatke s pomočjo strukturiranega vprašalnika. Moj namenski vzorec je sestavljen iz 8 centrov za socialno delo, ki delujejo na območjih, ki so bila zaradi poplav najbolj prizadeta. Ugotovila sem, da so po poplavah centri za socialno delo delovali na terenu, kar je najbolj učinkovit način nudenja pomoči in prepoznavanja potreb prebivalcev. Kot pomoč so vzpostavili krizne ekipe in izvajali nudenje psihosocialne pomoči, informacij, distribucijo nujnih materialnih sredstev, zagotavljanje namestitev ter iskanje prostovoljcev. Odzivanje po poplavah je temeljilo na smernicah države, regije, občin in lokalnih organizacij, pri nekaterih centrih pa tudi na internih postopkih za ravnanje v primeru naravnih nesreč. En mesec po poplavah so v sodelovanju z občinami in drugimi organizacijami še vedno izvajali pomoč, hkrati pa so vzdrževali stke z oškodovanci. Ključno za prepoznavanje potreb prebivalstva po poplavah sta bila delo na terenu in pogovor. Prepoznane potrebe so bile psihosocialne in materialne. Tekom izvajanja pomoči so imeli nekaj ovir, in sicer ovire na terenu, ovire pri prejemanju pomanjkljivih informacij od vodilnih služb in premalo razpoložljivega kadra strokovnih delavcev. Centri za socialno delo so sodelovali z lokalnimi, državnimi in nevladnimi organizacijami, kar je bilo ključno za nudenje celostne pomoči in učinkovitega odzivanja po poplavah. Skupaj z drugimi organizacijami so koordinirali iskanje prizadetih, obveščanje prebivalcev, delo na terenu, razdeljevanje pomoči in odpravo posledic. Vzpostavljeni so bili mobilni timi za izvajanje psihosocialne pomoči na terenu, kjer so socialni delavci opravljali svetovalno delo, razbremenilne pogovore in osebno pomoč. Večina socialnih delavcev ni bila del teh timov. Socialni delavci so opazili, da bi njihovo delo olajšalo zmanjšanje birokracije, prejemanje informacij, boljša mreža pomoči, večje število strokovnih delavcev in opreme ter več sredstev za centre za socialno delo. V prihodnosti bi lahko dali večji poudarek na nudenju pomoči ljudem v stiski, izvajanju psihosocialne pomoči, več dela na terenu in pomoči pri izpolnjevanju vlog za pomoč ter boljšo porazdelitev pomoči in sredstev.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:poplave, odzivanje centrov za socialno delo, socialno delo po poplavah, potrebe prebivalcev, sodelovanje med organizacijami, ovire pri delu
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Organization:FSD - Faculty of Social Work
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-160113 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.08.2024
Views:77
Downloads:21
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Response of Centres of Social Work in floods 2023 in Slovenia
Abstract:
The thesis covers the topic about the response of Centres of Social Work (CSW) after the floods that occurred in Slovenia in August 2023. Ways of responding after floods to repair the damage is crucial, as they are one of the most frequent and devastating natural disasters in Slovenia. I researched how CSW responded immediately and one month after the floods, what people’s needs were identified by social workers as a result of the floods, what barriers social workers faced in providing assistance after the floods, how CSW cooperated with other organisations after the floods and what do social workers want to improve in CSW in case of work after the floods. The research is qualitative in nature, and I collected data using a structured questionnaire. My sample consists of 8 CSW working in the areas most affected by the floods. I found that after the floods, CSW did fieldwork, which is the most effective way of providing assistance and identifying the needs of the population. They set up crisis teams and provided psychosocial assistance, information, distribution of emergency supplies, accommodation and searched for volunteers. The response to the floods was based on guidelines from the State, the region, municipalities and local organisations, and in some centres on internal procedures for dealing with natural disasters. One month after the floods, the work and assistance continued in cooperation with municipalities and other organisations, while also maintaining contact with the affected individuals. Field work and conversations were key to identifying the needs of the population after the floods. The needs identified were psychosocial and material. During the provision of assistance, some obstacles were encountered, such as obstacles in the field, obstacles in receiving insufficient information from the lead agencies and not enough available professional staff. The CSW cooperated with local, national and non-governmental organisations, which was crucial for providing integrated assistance and an effective response after the floods. CSW worked together with other organisations to coordinated the search for those affected, to inform the population, the do the fieldwork, to distribute assistance needed and to eliminate the consequences of the floods. Mobile teams were set up to provide psychosocial support in the field, with social workers providing counselling, debriefing and personal support. Most social workers were not part of these teams. Social workers observed that reduction of bureaucracy, being more informed, a better support network, more social workers, equipment and more resources for CSW, would help them with doing their tasks. In the future, more emphasis could be placed on helping people in need, providing psychosocial assistance, more fieldwork and assistance in filling in applications for aid, and better distribution of assistance and resources.

Keywords:floods, response of Centres of Social Work, social work after floods, needs of the people, cooperation with organisations, obstacles at work

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back