Sodelovanje lastnikov gozdov pri rabi strojev na območju Strojne, Zelen Brega in Suhega Vrha : diplomsko delo - univerzitetni študij

Oto, Simona (author), Krč, Janez (mentor), Pezdevšek Malovrh, Špela (co-mentor)

Zaradi ekonomičnega in bolj učinkovitega gospodarjenja z gozdovi na razdrobljeni gozdni posesti, je smotrno spodbujati povezovanje zasebnih lastnikov gozdov. V diplomski nalogi so s pomočjo ankete želeli pridobili mnenje lastnikov gozdov o skupni rabi strojev. Želeli so ugotoviti, kakšna je stopnja aktivnosti prebivalcev Strojne, Zelen brega in Suhega vrha v različnihoblikah povezovanja lastnikov gozdov. Raziskavo so teritorialno omejili na območje Strojne, kjer lastniki gozdov sodelujejo pri rabi strojev in so povezani v strojno skupnost. V raziskavo so bile zajete tudi sosednje vasi, da bi ugotovili, ali obstajajo razlike med lastniki, ki sodelujejo pri rabi strojev in med tistimi, ki ne. Anketna vprašanja so bila razdeljena na štiri sklope, anketa pa je bila opravljena v obliki osebnega intervjuja po posameznih kmetijah. Ugotovili so, da velikost posesti in socialnoekonomski status ne vplivata na pripravljenost lastnikov za sodelovanje pri skupni rabi strojev. Prav tako ni statistično značilno, da lastnik, ki sodeluje pri rabi strojev, več dela v gozdu opravi sam z družinskimi člani. Seznanjenost anketiranih z oblikami povezovanja lastnikov gozdov na tem območju je dobra, saj je 50 % anketiranih aktivnih v zadrugi, 44 % v strojni skupnosti in 30 % vštudijskem krožku. Dobra polovica anketiranih si ne želi postati član v društvu lastnikov gozdov ali v strojni skupnosti, tretjina anketiranih pa ne bi bila član strojnega krožka, zadruge in študijskega krožka. Slabo pripravljenost za sodelovanje pripisujejo pomanjkanju informacij o delovanju oblik povezovanja in prednostih, ki jih članstvo prinaša. Informacije o prednostih povezovanja bi lastniki morali pridobiti od terenskih gozdarjev terkmetijsko gozdarske službe. Rezultati kažejo, da terenski gozdarji ne spodbujajo povezovanja lastnikov gozdov ter da so anketiranci nezadovoljni z delovanjem kmetijske svetovalne službe.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: zasebni gozdovi, sodelovanje lastnikov, raba strojev
• Work type: Undergraduate thesis
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: BF - Biotechnical Faculty
• Place of publishing: Ljubljana
• Publisher: [S. Oto]
• Year: 2011
• Number of pages: XI, 60 str. + pril.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-15987
• UDC: 630*9
• COBISS.SI-ID: 3172518
• Publication date in RUL: 11.07.2014

Secondary language

• Language: Unknown

Abstract

In order to establish effective forest economy in a crumbled forest estate it is suitable to stimulate collaboration among private forest owners. The aim ofthe thesis was to determine the opinions of forest owners about collective machine usage with the help of a questionnaire. The main question was to find out the level of activity among the residents of Strojna, Zelen breg and Suhi vrh concerning different forms of forest owners' mutual cooperation. The area of Strojna was chosen because the forest owners there already participate in machine usage and joined in a machinery group. Neighbouring villages were included in order to find any differences between the forest owners who cooperate in machine usage and those who do not. The questions were divided into four clusters and the poll was conducted in the form of interviews on thefarms in question. It was established that the size of the properties and the social-economic status do not interfere with the owners' willingness to cooperate in collective machine usage. It is also not statistically significant that the owner who cooperates in machine usage does more work in the forest on his own along with his family members. The owners interviewed are well acquainted with the forms of collaboration among the forest owners inthis area since 50 % of them are active in the co-operative, 44 % are activein the machinery group and 30 % of them are active in the study club. A good half of them do not wish to become members of the Forest Owner Association or the machinery group and a third of them would not want to be a member of the machine hire syndicate, co-operative or the study club. Lack of information about various forms of collaboration and the advantages of membership are the reasons behind the owners' poor willingness for cooperation. The field foresters and the agricultural forest service should bethe source of information on the advantages of mutual collaboration for forest owners. The results show that the field foresters do not stimulate cooperation among the forest owners and that the owners interviewed are not satisfied with the operation of the agricultural forest service.