izpis_h1_title_alt

Sodelovanje učitelja za dodatno strokovno pomoč z učitelji in vodstvom
ID Povše, Anja (Author), ID Jeznik, Katja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Mažgon, Jasna (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,33 MB)
MD5: F63DCF7D6CE451894419A7753941D021

Abstract
Rezultati različnih raziskav kažejo, da individualno ali skupinsko poučevanje učencev s posebnimi potrebami v razredu pripomore k njihovi večji socialni vključenosti in učni uspešnosti. Inkluzivno naravnana pedagoška praksa je mogoča ob premišljenem in načrtovanem timskem sodelovanju učitelja za dodatno strokovno pomoč in preostalih učiteljev. V nalogi smo želeli ugotoviti, kakšno je timsko sodelovanje učitelja za dodatno strokovno pomoč in učitelja razredne oziroma predmetne stopnje, ko govorimo o obravnavi in delu z učenci s posebnimi potrebami. Ker takšno delo omogoča in spodbuja ravnatelj šole, smo v raziskavo vključili tudi njih. Empirični del naloge smo razdelili na dva dela. V prvem delu smo izvedli anketiranje učiteljev, v drugem delu pa smo intervjuvali tri ravnatelje. Analizirali smo, kako učitelji za dodatno strokovno pomoč sodelujejo pri obravnavi učencev s posebnimi potrebami preko petstopenjskega modela pomoči z učitelji. Način dela se med slovenskimi šolami močno razlikuje, zato nas je zanimalo, ali prevladuje sodelovanje zgolj na ravni integracije ali tudi v luči željene inkluzivne paradigme. Ugotovili smo, da učitelji večinoma medsebojno timsko sodelovanje ocenjujejo kot dobro in se hkrati strinjajo, da takšen način dela pripomore k izboljšanju odnosov med sodelavci ter vpliva na večjo ciljno naravnanost pouka oziroma doseganje zastavljenih ciljev. Podobno menijo tudi ravnatelji. Navajali so različne načine, s katerimi spodbujajo timsko delo: preko obveznih, a hkrati neformalnih mesečnih druženj; s hospitacijami – na isti stopnji poučevanja ter na drugi; preko projektnega dela; z izvajanjem mentorstva. Kljub temu kar tretjina učiteljev meni, da njihov ravnatelj timskega dela ne spodbuja v dovolj veliki meri. Učitelji glavno oviro za timsko delo prepoznajo v časovni stiski ter kot izziv pri usklajevanju medsebojnih urnikov. Večjih razlik med učitelji predmetne in razredne stopnje nismo zaznali. V nekoliko večjem deležu učitelji razredne stopnje sodelujejo pri pripravi mnenja za potrebe postopka usmerjanja učenca s posebnimi potrebami ter pri pripravi individualiziranega programa. Ugotovili smo, da kar tretjina učiteljev meni, da poučevanje dveh učiteljev hkrati v razredu ne vpliva na zmanjšanje pogostosti konfliktov med učitelji in učenci. V nalogi obravnavamo procesa supervizije in intervizije, ki spodbujata in omogočata refleksijo pedagoške prakse v okviru timskega sodelovanja. Preverili smo, kako dobro ju učitelji in ravnatelji poznajo ter jih vprašali o njihovih morebitnih izkušnjah v praksi. Rezultati kažejo, da 70,9 % strokovnih delavcev še ni bilo vključenih v procesa, so pa v odgovorih izrazili željo po vključitvi,medtem ko sta dva izmed ravnateljev dejala, da redno izvajata intervizije za svoj kolektiv, saj zaznavata pozitivne učinke. Ugotovitve kažejo, da je za uresničevanje inkluzije nujno skrbno načrtovano, izvedeno ter evalvirano timsko sodelovanje med učiteljem dodatne strokovne pomoči ter preostalimi učitelji. Procese timskega sodelovanja pa mora ustrezno podpreti tudi vodstvo šole.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:timsko sodelovanje, učitelj za dodatno strokovno pomoč, ravnatelj, supervizija, intervizija
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-159765 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:24.07.2024
Views:245
Downloads:63
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Collaboration of the special education teacher with other teachers and management
Abstract:
Research of different results indicate that individual or group teaching of students with special needs in the classroom contributes to their better social inclusion and academical successfully. Pedagogical practice is possible with thoughtful and planned teamwork between the special education teacher and other teachers. Our research aimed to determine the nature of teamwork between the special education teacher and the classroom or subject teacher when working with students with special needs. Since the school headteacher supports this work, we also involved headteachers in the research. We divided the empirical part of the thesis into two parts. In the first part, we surveyed teachers and for the second part, we interviewed three headteachers. We analysed how special education teachers collaborate with other teachers through a five-level model of assistance. The approach varies significantly among Slovenian schools, so we wanted to determine whether collaboration predominantly occurs at the level of integration or the desired inclusive paradigm too. We determined that teachers mostly rate their mutual teamwork as good. They also believe this type of collaboration helps improve the relationships among colleagues and contributes to a more goal-oriented teaching approach. Headteachers have similar views on encouraging teamwork. They cited various methods like mandatory yet informal monthly meetings, peer observations at the same and different teaching levels, project work, and mentorship programs. Despite this, a third of the teachers believe their headteacher does not sufficiently promote teamwork. Teachers identify time constraints and scheduling challenges as the main obstacles to teamwork. We did not observe significant differences between subject and classroom teachers. A slightly higher proportion of classroom teachers participate in preparing opinions for the student guidance process and developing individualised programs for students with special needs. We found that a third of the teachers believe that co-teaching does not reduce the frequency of conflicts between teachers and students. In our study, we discuss the processes of supervision and intervision, which promote and enable reflection on pedagogical practice within teamwork. We assessed the familiarity of teachers and headteachers with these processes and inquired about their practical experiences. Result shows that 70.9% of the educational staff have not participated in these processes yet, but have expressed a desire to do so. In addition, two of the headteachers stated that they regularly conduct intervisions for their staff and have noted positive effects. The findings of the study remind headteachers and professional staff educating students with special needs that careful planning, execution, and evaluation of teamwork between special education teachers and other teachers are essential conditions for inclusive treatment. The findings show that in order to realize inclusion, it is necessary to carefully plan, execute and evaluate teamwork between special education teachers and other teachers.

Keywords:teamwork, special education teacher, headteacher, supervision, intervision

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back