izpis_h1_title_alt

Current status and future challenges of genotoxicity OECD Test Guidelines for nanomaterials: a workshop report
ID Doak, Shareen H. (Author), ID Drobne, Damjana (Author), et al.

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (293,27 KB)
MD5: 1FD055C39A319F1A23C679DA8D2F7B84
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://academic.oup.com/mutage/article/38/4/183/7180365 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Genotoxicity testing for nanomaterials remains challenging as standard testing approaches require some adaptation, and further development of nano-specific OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) and Guidance Documents (GDs) are needed. However, the field of genotoxicology continues to progress and new approach methodologies (NAMs) are being developed that could provide relevant information on the range of mechanisms of genotoxic action that may be imparted by nanomaterials. There is a recognition of the need for implementation of new and/or adapted OECD TGs, new OECD GDs, and utilization of NAMs within a genotoxicity testing framework for nanomaterials. As such, the requirements to apply new experimental approaches and data for genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials in a regulatory context is neither clear, nor used in practice. Thus, an international workshop with representatives from regulatory agencies, industry, government, and academic scientists was convened to discuss these issues. The expert discussion highlighted the current deficiencies that exist in standard testing approaches within exposure regimes, insufficient physicochemical characterization, lack of demonstration of cell or tissue uptake and internalization, and limitations in the coverage of genotoxic modes of action. Regarding the latter aspect, a consensus was reached on the importance of using NAMs to support the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials. Also highlighted was the need for close engagement between scientists and regulators to (i) provide clarity on the regulatory needs, (ii) improve the acceptance and use of NAM-generated data, and (iii) define how NAMs may be used as part of weight of evidence approaches for use in regulatory risk assessments.

Language:English
Keywords:nanomaterials, nanosafety, genotoxicity, in vitro 3D models, OECD, new approach methodologies, NAMs
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:BF - Biotechnical Faculty
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2023
Number of pages:Str. 183-191
Numbering:Vol. 38, iss. 4
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-159120 This link opens in a new window
ISSN on article:0267-8357
DOI:10.1093/mutage/gead017 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:01.07.2024
Views:73
Downloads:10
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Mutagenesis
Shortened title:Mutagenesis
Publisher:Oxford University Press, UK Environmental Mutagen Society
ISSN:0267-8357
COBISS.SI-ID:25991936 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Projects

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:814425
Name:Risk Governance of Nanotechnology
Acronym:RiskGONE

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:814401
Name:Implementation of Risk Governance: meeting the needs of nanotechnology
Acronym:Gov4Nano

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:814530
Name:Establishing a Nanotechnology Risk Governance Framework
Acronym:NANORIGO

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:101008099
Name:NanoInformatics Approaches for Safe-by-Design NanoMaterials
Acronym:CompSafeNano

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back