izpis_h1_title_alt

The loss of synthetic past tense forms in Slovene in the context of the hypothesised Central European convergence area
ID Šekli, Matej (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (608,75 KB)
MD5: 9E5A57E2F6F1D1617F74975EFFD1BE38
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/slaw-2024-0017/html This link opens in a new window

Abstract
One of the salient morphosyntactic features of the hypothesised Central European convergence area is allegedly a simple three-tense verb system (i.e. past, present, and future) without any formal and semantic distinction between the different past tense forms. The simplification of the originally more complex past tense system has been claimed to be contact-induced, which is mirrored in the loss of synthetic past tense forms in the linguistic history of German and Slavic. The article verifies the hypothesis according to which the loss of the preterit (i.e. a synthetic past tense form) in Upper German caused the disappearance of synthetic past tense forms, i.e. the aorist and the imperfect, in Slavic, more specifically Slovene. First, the process of the loss of the aorist and the imperfect in three medieval Slovene texts is presented, viz. the Freising Fragments (c. 972–1039), the Klagenfurt/Celovec or Rateče Manuscript (2nd half of the 14th century), and the Castelmonte/Stara Gora Manuscript (end of the 15th century). Second, the use of the preterit and the perfect in the Early New High German text Ain newes lied von den kraynneriʃchen bauren (c. 1515) from the South Bavarian-Austrian speech territory, more precisely Lower Styria, is analysed. The historical linguistic analysis of the cited Slovene and German linguistic material (the latter originating from the Slovene linguistic area as well) shows that in medieval Slovene the aorist (and most probably the imperfect, too) was lost no later than by the end of the 15th century, while the formal and semantic distinction between the preterit on one hand and the perfect on the other is still preserved in Early New High German documented in the “Slovene-speaking lands” in the second decade of the 16th century. From these facts one cannot but conclude that the loss of synthetic past tense forms in Slovene could not have been influenced by (the demonstrably later) loss of the preterit in South Bavarian-Austrian German dialects, which were historically (and in some regions still are) in geographical and, consequently, sociolinguistic contact with Slovene.

Language:English
Keywords:Slovene, Upper German, historical linguistics, Central European convergence area, synthetic past tense forms
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FF - Faculty of Arts
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2024
Number of pages:Str. 341-361
Numbering:Vol. 69, iss. 2
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158963 This link opens in a new window
UDC:[811.163.6+811.112.2]'361
ISSN on article:0044-3506
DOI:10.1515/slaw-2024-0017 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:199543811 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:24.06.2024
Views:46
Downloads:15
Metadata:XML RDF-CHPDL DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Zeitschrift für Slawistik
Shortened title:Z. Slaw.
Publisher:De Gruyter
ISSN:0044-3506
COBISS.SI-ID:26680576 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Description:This is the standard Creative Commons license that gives others maximum freedom to do what they want with the work as long as they credit the author.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:slovenščina, nemščina, zgodovinsko jezikoslovje, srednjeevropska jezikovna zveza, sintetične oblike preteklega časa

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back