izpis_h1_title_alt

Analiza implementacije participativnega proračuna v Občinah Hrpelje - Kozina, Postojna in Cascais : diplomsko delo
ID Uljan, Blaž (Author), ID Klun, Maja (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (1,18 MB)
MD5: 49C8E4813D18BB53557F7DBA6F1C16F0

Abstract
Tema diplomskega dela je participativni proračun, tj. novodobni proces upravljanja in razporejanja proračunskega denarja, ki občanom omogoča soodločanje s podajanjem predlogov in glasovanjem za projekte, ki zajemajo vnaprej določen delež proračunskih sredstev. Kljub temu da je proces participativnega proračuna dokaj neraziskan in ga v Sloveniji prakticira 30,5 % vseh občin, iz tujine poročajo o pozitivnih učinkih, ki jih prinaša povišana participacija občanov pri sooblikovanju občinske politike. Namen diplomskega dela je preučiti proces implementacije participativnega proračuna v izbranih slovenskih občinah in ga primerjati s primerom dobre prakse iz tujine. Prvi del diplomskega dela predstavi področje participativnega proračuna od definicije, zgodovine, pravne podlage do opisa ter primerjave procesa iz slovenskih občin Hrpelje - Kozina in Postojna z občino Cascais na Portugalskem. Uporabljena je bila deskriptivna metoda raziskovanja. V drugem delu smo z uporabo raziskovalne metode anketiranja pridobili demografske podatke in mnenje občanov o procesu. Ugotovili smo, da so občani slovenskih občin pasivnejši v vseh fazah participativnega proračuna predvsem zaradi relativno nizkih sredstev, namenjenih za projekte, in slabega oglaševanja ter ozaveščanja. Diplomsko delo predvsem zaradi empiričnega dela nudi povratne informacije občanov o procesu participativnega proračuna, ki se počasi razvija in nadgrajuje ter tako postaja vedno pomembnejši del prakse javnega sektorja in njegovih politik. Povratne informacije so edini način, da se proces izboljša, in ugotovili smo, da tako v Sloveniji kot tudi v tujini primanjkuje raziskav o mnenju udeležencev. Naša raziskava je zato pomemben prispevek k družbenemu okolju, predvsem občinskim uradnikom, ki lahko ugotovitve uporabijo za izboljšavo procesa participativnega proračuna.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:participativni proračun, participacija, občina, demokracija, Postojna, Hrpelje - Kozina, Cascais
Work type:Bachelor thesis/paper
Typology:2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:FU - Faculty of Administration
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:[B. Uljan]
Year:2024
Number of pages:X, 66 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158879 This link opens in a new window
UDC:352:336.14(497.4:469)(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:199696643 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:21.06.2024
Views:306
Downloads:41
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:The analysis of implementation of participatory budgeting in selected municipalities: Hrpelje - Kozina, Postojna and Cascais
Abstract:
The topic of the diploma thesis is participatory budgeting, a new-age process of managing and allocating municipal budget money, where citizens have the opportunity to co-decision, i.e. to propose and vote for projects that take up a certain share of budget funds. The purpose of the thesis is to examine the process of implementation of participatory budgeting in selected Slovenian municipalities and to compare the process with an example of good practice from abroad. The first part of the diploma thesis takes up the field of participatory budgeting from the definition, history, legal basis to the description and comparison of the process in the Slovenian municipalities of Hrpelje - Kozina and Postojna with the municipality of Cascais in Portugal. A descriptive research method was used. In the second part, we obtained demographic data using the method of research survey. We found that the citizens of Slovenian municipalities are more passive in all phases of participatory budgeting, largely due to relatively low funds allocated for projects and poor advertising. The thesis, mainly due to the empirical work, provides feedback from citizens involved in the process of participatory budgeting, which is slowly developing and upgrading. Feedback is the only way to improve the process, and we found that both in Slovenia and abroad there is a lack of research that includes opinion of participants, therefore our research has an important contribution to the social environment, especially to municipal officials, who can use the findings to improve the process of participatory budgeting.

Keywords:participatory budgeting, participation, municipality, democracy, Postojna, Hrpelje - Kozina, Cascais

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back