izpis_h1_title_alt

Pregled uporabe monoklonskih protiteles proti SARS-CoV-2 v Splošni bolnišnici Murska Sobota v letih 2021 in 2022
ID Števančec, Nuša (Author), ID Kerec Kos, Mojca (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Kovačič, Alenka (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (910,78 KB)
MD5: 1D80A203EE6678C557A0949C90904B67

Abstract
COVID-19 je nalezljiva bolezen, ki zaradi njene razsežnosti predstavlja nevarnost za preobremenitev zdravstvenega sistema. Monoklonska protitelesa (mAb) proti SARS-CoV-2 pripomorejo k olajšanju bremena COVID-19 za bolnika in zdravstveni sistem, saj preprečijo okužbo oziroma napredovanje bolezni v hudo obliko in s tem povezane zaplete. To je posebej pomembno pri bolnikih, ki imajo prisoten dejavnik tveganja za razvoj hujše oblike bolezni in posledično hospitalizacijo ob okužbi. Namen te raziskave je bil analizirati značilnosti bolnikov, ki so prejeli mAb proti SARS-CoV-2 v Splošni bolnišnici Murska Sobota, in ugotoviti, kakšni so bili izidi uporabe mAb z vidika preprečevanja okužbe oziroma hospitalizacije in smrti. Izvedli smo retrospektivno raziskavo, v katero smo vključili 232 naročilnic za mAb. Pregledali smo anamnezo in odpustno pismo bolnika, ko je bolnik prejel mAb, in druge obravnave v tej bolnišnici v obdobju 6 mesecev po aplikaciji. Bolniki, ki so prejeli mAb, so imeli izmed sočasnih obolenj najpogosteje prisotno arterijsko hipertenzijo, rakava obolenja in atrijsko fibrilacijo. Najpogosteje predpisane učinkovine v redni terapiji so bile pantoprazol, bisoprolol, acetilsalicilna kislina, furosemid in statini. Večina bolnikov pred aplikacijo mAb še ni prebolela COVID-19, razen pri tiksagevimabu/cilgavimabu. Največji delež necepljenih bolnikov je bil med bolniki, ki so prejeli regdanvimab (50 % necepljenih bolnikov), najmanjši pa med tistimi, ki so prejeli tiksagevimab/cilgavimab (11 % necepljenih bolnikov). Pri profilaksi je bil najuspešnejši kasirivimab/imdevimab (noben bolnik ni zbolel za COVID-19). Pri preprečevanju hospitalizacije zaradi COVID-19 je bil najbolj učinkovit tiksagevimab/cilgavimab (96 % učinkovitost), najmanj učinkovit pa sotrovimab (88 % učinkovitost). 28-dnevno preživetje je bilo najvišje pri tiksagevimabu/cilgavimabu, najnižje pa pri regdanvimabu. 6-mesečno preživetje je bilo najvišje pri kasirivimabu/imdevimabu in najnižje pri sotrovimabu ter regdanvimabu. Ugotovili smo, da pri regdanvimabu tveganje za smrt povečajo moški spol in več sočasnih obolenj (vpliv na 28-dnevno preživetje), pri kasirivimabu/imdevimabu ženski spol, višja starost, večje število predpisanih zdravil in daljše časovno obdobje od zadnjega cepljenja (vpliv na 6-mesečno preživetje), pri tiksagevimabu/cilgavimabu pa višja starost, okužba kot vzrok aplikacije in odsotnost zgodovine COVID-19 (vpliv na 6-mesečno preživetje).

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, monoklonska protitelesa, značilnosti bolnikov, izidi
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Organization:FFA - Faculty of Pharmacy
Year:2024
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158510 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:14.06.2024
Views:281
Downloads:73
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Review of the use of monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at the Murska Sobota General Hospital in years 2021 and 2022
Abstract:
COVID-19 is a contagious disease that poses a risk of overburdening the health care system due to its large scale. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against SARS-CoV-2 help to ease the burden of COVID-19 on the patient and the healthcare system, as they prevent infection or progression to a severe disease and related complications. This is especially important for patients with risk factors for the development of more severe symptoms and, as a result, hospitalization. The purpose of this research was to analyze the characteristics of patients who received mAb against SARS-CoV-2 at Murska Sobota General Hospital, and to determine what the outcomes of mAb use were in terms of preventing infection or hospitalization and death. We performed a retrospective survey, including 232 mAb order forms. We reviewed the patient's medical history and discharge letter when the patient received the mAb and other patient's treatments at that hospital within 6 months of administration. For all mAb, the most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension, cancer and atrial fibrillation. The most frequently prescribed drugs in regular therapy were pantoprazole, bisoprolol, acetylsalicylic acid, furosemide and statins. Most patients did not have a history of COVID-19, except in the case of tixagevimab/cilgavimab. The highest proportion of unvaccinated patients was among patients who received regdanvimab (50% of unvaccinated patients) and the lowest among those who received tixagevimab/cilgavimab (11% of unvaccinated patients). Casirivimab/imdevimab was the most successful mAb at prophylaxis (no patient contracted COVID-19). Tixagevimab/cilgavimab was the most effective mAb in preventing hospitalization due to COVID-19 (96% efficacy), while sotrovimab was the least effective (88% efficacy). 28-day survival was the highest with tixagevimab/cilgavimab and the lowest with regdanvimab. 6-month survival was the highest with casirivimab/imdevimab and the lowest with sotrovimab and regdanvimab. We found that with regdanvimab, the risk of death increases with male gender and more comorbidities (impact on 28-day survival), with casirivimab/imdevimab, the risk of death increases with female gender, older age, a greater number of prescribed drugs and a longer period of time since the last vaccination (impact on 6 -month survival), and in the case of tisagevimab/cilgavimab, the risk of death increases with older age, infection as the cause of the mAb administration and lack of history of COVID-19 (impact on 6-month survival).

Keywords:SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, monoclonal antibodies, patients' characteristics, outcomes

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back