izpis_h1_title_alt

Questioning the ASTM G32-16 (stationary specimen) standard cavitation erosion test
ID Dular, Matevž (Author), ID Barragan Montalvo, Guillermo Enrique (Author), ID Hočevar, Marko (Author), ID Novak, Lovrenc (Author), ID Ohl, Claus-Dieter (Author), ID Petkovšek, Martin (Author)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (7,65 MB)
MD5: 6B7B8537FD7DE15DADE36C5EAAAC1749
URLURL - Source URL, Visit https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417724001780 This link opens in a new window

Abstract
Cavitation erosion is one of the most severe problems encountered in hydraulic turbomachinery. When testing the materials, the engineers usually rely on standardized procedures. The most common one being the vibratory ASTM G-32 test, which offers two possibilities of performing the test – the direct, where the specimen is attached to the ultrasonic device and the indirect, where the specimen is stationary and exposed to the ultrasonic horn, positioned just 0.5 mm from it. The erosion rates from the two are significantly different and a question may be asked if they are at all comparable and further on are they comparable to the “real-life” hydrodynamic cavitation which occurs in turbomachinery. In this study we performed erosion tests on a stationary specimen where the gap between the specimen and the horn was varied from 0.3 to 4 mm. In addition, we used high speed visualization to observe the cavitation in the gap. We observed that the cavitation erosion rate strongly depends on the gap. From visualization we see that the cavitation dynamics significantly changes in a small gap, leading to a large, but 2-dimensional cavitation bubbles which collapse very slowly, compared to the small spherical ones in a larger gap. We investigated the probability of shock wave occurrence and derived a very simple model, which gives accurate qualitative predictions of experimental data. Finally, the study puts into question the validity of ASTM G32 test – the most common approach used in engineering today.

Language:English
Keywords:cavitation, bubbles, erosion, G32 standard
Work type:Article
Typology:1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
Publication status:Published
Publication version:Version of Record
Year:2024
Number of pages:10
Numbering:Vol. 107, art. 106930
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158473 This link opens in a new window
UDC:532.528
ISSN on article:1350-4177
DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106930 This link opens in a new window
COBISS.SI-ID:198798083 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:13.06.2024
Views:309
Downloads:58
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Record is a part of a journal

Title:Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Shortened title:Ultrason. sonochem.
Publisher:Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science
ISSN:1350-4177
COBISS.SI-ID:707668 This link opens in a new window

Licences

License:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Link:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Description:A creative commons license that bans commercial use, but the users don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.

Secondary language

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:kavitacija, mehurčki, erozija, G32 standard

Projects

Funder:EC - European Commission
Funding programme:H2020
Project number:771567
Name:An investigation of the mechanisms at the interaction between cavitation bubbles and contaminants
Acronym:CABUM

Funder:ARIS - Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency
Project number:P2-0422
Name:Funkcionalne tekočine za napredne energetske sisteme

Funder:Other - Other funder or multiple funders
Funding programme:Humboldt Foundation Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back