Your browser does not allow JavaScript!
JavaScript is necessary for the proper functioning of this website. Please enable JavaScript or use a modern browser.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana
Open Science Slovenia
Open Science
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Search
Browse
New in RUL
About RUL
In numbers
Help
Sign in
Details
Political liberalism vs. right-wing libertarianism : John Rawls in encounter with Robert Nozick
ID
Ramet, Sabrina P.
(
Author
)
PDF - Presentation file,
Download
(198,74 KB)
MD5: 6BA814220718ED7149704F9FC17805C6
Image galllery
Abstract
Among twentieth-century political philosophers, Americans John Rawls and Robert Nozick are generally recognized as giants – both for the boldness of their arguments and for the influence they have exerted. They sketched rival visions. Rawls, inspired by Immanuel Kant, argued for a world characterized by tolerance, equality, and justice as fairness. Nozick, claiming a Lockean heritage but actually inspired by Adam Smith (the “invisible hand”) and Herbert Spencer (“survival of the fittest”), outlined a program for a minimal state, with very little taxation, offering no cushion at all against poverty, and providing no state assistance for the poor, the sick, the disabled, or the widowed. Rawls’ vision is clearly part of the liberal tradition, while Nozick’s championing of a minimal state contains illiberal elementsMed političnimi filozofi 20. stoletja sta Američana John Rawls in Robert Nozick splošno priznana kot velikana – tako zaradi drznosti njunih argumentov kot zaradi njunega vpliva. Avtorja orisujeta nasprotujoči si viziji. Rawls, ki se navdihuje pri Immanuelu Kantu, zagovarja svet, za katerega so značilni strpnost, enakost in pravičnost kot poštenost. Nozick, ki izhaja iz lockeovske dediščine, dejansko pa ga navdihujeta Adam Smith (“nevidna roka”) in Herbert Spencer (“preživetje najmočnejšega”), pa je orisal program minimalne države z minimalnimi davki, ki ne ponuja nobenih ublažitev revščine in nobene državne pomoči za revne, bolne, ljudi z oviranostjo ali ovdovele. Rawlsova vizija je seveda del liberalne tradicije, medtem ko Nozickova, ki zagovarja minimalno državo, vsebuje iliberalne elemente.
Language:
English
Keywords:
political liberalism
,
taxation
,
equality
,
justice
Work type:
Article
Typology:
1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:
FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publication status:
Published
Publication version:
Version of Record
Publication date:
01.01.2024
Year:
2024
Number of pages:
Str. 57-72, 242
Numbering:
Letn. 61, št. 1
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-156074
UDC:
321.01"19"
ISSN on article:
0040-3598
DOI:
10.51936/tip.61.1.57
COBISS.SI-ID:
193665027
Publication date in RUL:
07.05.2024
Views:
413
Downloads:
57
Metadata:
Cite this work
Plain text
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Copy citation
Share:
Record is a part of a journal
Title:
Teorija in praksa : revija za družbena vprašanja
Shortened title:
Teor. praksa
Publisher:
Fakulteta za družbene vede
ISSN:
0040-3598
COBISS.SI-ID:
763652
Secondary language
Language:
Slovenian
Title:
Politični liberalizem vs. desni libertarizem
Keywords:
politični liberalizem
,
davki
,
enakost
,
pravičnost
Similar documents
Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:
Back