izpis_h1_title_alt

Vključevanje izbranih skupin učencev s posebnimi potrebami v pouk tehnike in tehnologije v redno osnovno šolo : magistrsko delo
ID Dobravec, Katarina (Author), ID Avsec, Stanislav (Mentor) More about this mentor... This link opens in a new window, ID Košak Babuder, Milena (Comentor)

.pdfPDF - Presentation file, Download (2,48 MB)
MD5: 5F0D07D9E60FC361780B8B35197D0EA6

Abstract
V magistrskem delu smo se posvetili vključevanju izbranih skupin učencev s posebnimi potrebami (v nadaljevanju PP) v pouk tehnike in tehnologije (v nadaljevanju TIT) v redno osnovno šolo. Namen dela je ugotoviti, kako smo v Sloveniji pripravljeni na inkluzijo, kako dobro so učitelji TIT v redni osnovni šoli usposobljeni za inkluzivno vključevanje učencev s PP ter koliko tega znanja imajo oziroma pridobijo bodoči učitelji TIT v okviru študija. V teoretičnem delu magistrskega dela smo opredelili pojem učencev s PP in predstavili skupine učencev s PP, pri tem pa smo se posvetili štirim izbranim skupinam učencev s PP, to so gibalno ovirani učenci, učenci z avtističnimi motnjami, slepi in slabovidni učenci ter gluhi in naglušni učenci. Zanimale so nas prilagoditve oblik in metod dela, vrednotenje dosežkov, motivacija za učno delo pri pouku TIT učencev s PP. Informacije o tem smo pridobili s pomočjo namensko oblikovanega vprašalnika, s katerim smo tudi ugotavljali, kakšnih prilagoditev so deležni učenci s PP pri pouku TIT in kako učitelji te prilagoditve izvajajo v učnem procesu. Vprašalnik smo izvedli tudi med bodočimi učitelji TIT, s katerim smo pridobili informacije o tem, kako se čutijo kompetentne za delo z učenci s PP. Za mnenje o tem, kako sodelujejo z učitelji TIT ter kakšna se jim zdijo organizacija in načini ter oblike ocenjevanja pri pouku TIT, smo vprašali tudi starše vseh učencev – tako tistih s PP kakor tistih brez PP. V empiričnem delu smo uporabili kvantitativno-kvalitativni raziskovalni pristop. Vzorec zajema učitelje TIT, bodoče TIT ter starše učencev s PP in starše učencev brez PP. Osrednja metoda je neeksperimentalno kavzalna metoda, kjer smo uporabili anketni vprašalnik. Pridobljene podatke smo analizirali s pomočjo statističnega programa SPSS 23.0. Prikazali smo frekvence, odstotke, minimum, maksimum, povprečne vrednosti in standardne odklone odgovorov. Za namen preverjanja porazdelitve ocen smo uporabili Shapiro-Wilkov test normalnosti. Z uporabo neparamtričnega Mann-Whitney testa smo iskali statistične razlike v ocenah med dvema skupinama, za iskanje statistično pomembnih razlik v ocenah med tremi skupinami pa smo uporabili neparametrični Kruskall-Wallis test. Če je le-ta potrdil statistično pomembne razlike, smo nato izvedli še Dunnov-Bonnferonijev test. S pomočjo formul smo izračunali tudi moč učinka. Nato smo s pomočjo pridobljenih rezultatov in teoretičnega dela odgovorili na zastavljena raziskovalna vprašanja in preverili doseganje zadanih ciljev. Pri ocenah primernosti načinov in oblik ocenjevanja izbranih skupin učencev s PP smo potrdili statistično pomembne razlike med bodočimi učitelji in učitelji ter med bodočimi učitelji in starši. Pri obojih je bila moč učinka srednje močna (0,3 < r < 0,5). Pri raziskovalnem vprašanju glede mnenja o kompetentnosti učiteljev ter bodočih učiteljev pri delu z učenci s PP smo prav tako potrdili več statistično pomembnih razlik. Pri specifičnih znanjih smo ugotovili, da imajo učitelji dobro mnenje glede svojih specifičnih znanj, bodoči učitelji pa se na tem področju čutijo manj kompetentne. Moč učinka je visoka (r > 0,5). Enako ugotovimo za veščine in spretnosti pri pouku TIT (moč učinka je pri enem izmed vidikov visoka, pri drugih dveh pa srednje visoka, vendar blizu vrednosti 0,5). Pri kompetenci odnos in sprejemanje smo zaznali statistično pomembne razlike pri dveh od sedmih trditev. Učitelji se bolj strinjajo s tem, da je dosežke učencev s PP smiselno ocenjevati enako kot ostale učence, medtem ko se bodoči učitelji bolj strinjajo s tem, da je smiselno pripraviti posebne učne vsebine za učence s PP. Pri obeh trditvah je moč učinkov srednja. Statistično pomembne razlike pri kompetenci sodelovalno okolje se pokažejo pri treh od šestih trditev. Učitelji se nekoliko manj strinjajo s tem, da bi moral biti učitelj odgovoren le za poučevanje učencev brez PP, vendar moramo poudariti, da se obe skupini s to trditvijo ne strinjata (moč učinka je na meji srednje vrednosti r = 0,35). Učitelji se v povprečju tudi bolj strinjajo s tem, da do sedaj dostopno gradivo (pisno in multimedijsko) že zadošča za poglobljen študij o učencih s PP pri TIT (moč učinka je srednja r = 0,44). Učitelji se zato tudi manj strinjajo s tem, da bi potrebovali več usposabljanja za poučevanje otrok s PP (moč učinka je srednja). Pri oceni funkcionalnosti informacijsko-komunikacijske tehnologije (v nadaljevanju IKT) prav tako zaznamo statistično pomembne razlike. Pri skupini učencev z avtistično motnjo smo ugotovili več statistično pomembnih razlik. Učiteljem in staršem se zdijo YouTube posnetki, filmi, učna okolja robotike, e-pošta, Wikipedija, 3D modeliranje ter kodiranje oziroma programiranje funkcionalni oziroma zmerno funkcionalni, medtem ko se bodočim učiteljem dani vidiki zdijo mejno nefunkcionalni (moč učinka je močna). Z magistrskim delom želimo vplivati na področje vključevanja izbranih skupin učencev s PP pri pouku TIT. Nastalo magistrsko delo je lahko dobro izhodišče za nadaljnje raziskave na tem področju, poleg tega pa je lahko tudi dobra podlaga pri prenovi učnega načrta predmeta TIT v smislu vključevanja izbranih skupin učencev s PP.

Language:Slovenian
Keywords:Osnovnošolsko izobraževanje, Tehnika, Vzgoja in izobraževanje oseb s posebnimi potrebami, ocenjevanje, prilagoditve pouka, primerjalna analiza, tehnika in tehnologija, učenci s posebnimi potrebami.
Work type:Master's thesis/paper
Typology:2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:PEF - Faculty of Education
Place of publishing:Ljubljana
Publisher:K. Dobravec
Year:2024
Number of pages:IX, 85 str.
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-155591 This link opens in a new window
UDC:62-053.5-056(043.2)
COBISS.SI-ID:191662339 This link opens in a new window
Publication date in RUL:07.04.2024
Views:396
Downloads:45
Metadata:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Copy citation
Share:Bookmark and Share

Secondary language

Language:English
Title:Inclusion of selected groups of pupils with special educational needs in Technology lessons in regular primary school
Abstract:
In the master's thesis, we focused on the inclusion of selected groups of students with special needs (hereafter SN) in design and technology classes (hereafter TIT) in a regular elementary school. The purpose of the work is to determine how we are prepared for inclusion in Slovenia, how well TIT teachers in public primary schools are trained for the inclusive inclusion of SN students and how much of this knowledge future TIT teachers have or acquire during their studies. In the theoretical part of the master's thesis, we defined the concept of SN students and presented groups of SN students, and we focused on four selected groups of SN students, i.e. physically challenged students, students with autistic disorders, blind and partially sighted students, and deaf and partially deaf students. We were interested in adaptations of forms and methods of work, evaluation of achievements, motivation for work in TIT classes of SN pupils. We obtained information about this with the help of a purpose-designed questionnaire, which was also used to determine what kind of adaptations SN pupils receive in TIT lessons and how teachers implement these adaptations in the learning process. We also conducted a questionnaire among future TIT teachers, with which we obtained information about how competent they feel to work with SN students. We also asked the parents of all students, both those with SN and those without SN, for their opinion on how they cooperate with SN teachers and what they think the organization and methods and forms of assessment in SN lessons are. In the empirical work, we used a quantitative-qualitative research approach. The sample includes TIT teachers, future TIT and parents of SN students and parents of students without SN. The central method is a non-experimental causal method, where we used a survey questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed using the statistical program SPSS 23.0. We have shown the frequencies, percentages, minimum, maximum, average values and standard deviations of the responses. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test was used to check the distribution of scores. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was used to search for statistical differences in scores between two groups, and the non-parametric Kruskall-Wallis test was used to search for statistically significant differences in scores between three groups. If it confirmed statistically significant differences, we then performed the Dunn-Bonnferoni test. We also calculated the strength of the effect with the help of formulas. Then, with the help of the obtained results and theoretical work, we answered the research questions and verified the achievement of the set goals. When assessing the suitability of methods and forms of assessment of selected groups of SN students, we confirmed statistically significant differences between future teachers and teachers and between future teachers and parents. For both, the strength of the effect was medium strong (0.3 < r < 0.5). Regarding the research question regarding the opinion on the competence of teachers and future teachers in working with SN students, we also confirmed several statistically significant differences. Regarding specific skills, we found that teachers have a good opinion of their specific skills, while future teachers feel less competent in this area. The strength of the effect is high (r > 0.5). The same is found for skills and skills in TIT lessons (the strength of the effect is high for one of the aspects and medium high for the other two, but close to the value of 0.5). Regarding the attitude and acceptance competence, we detected statistically significant differences in two of the seven statements. Teachers are more likely to agree that it makes sense to evaluate the achievements of SN students in the same way as other students, while future teachers are more likely to agree that it makes sense to prepare special learning content for SN students. For both claims, the strength of the effects is medium. Statistically significant differences in the competence collaborative environment are shown in three out of six statements. The teachers somewhat less agree that the teacher should only be responsible for teaching students without SN, but we must emphasize that both groups do not agree with this statement (the strength of the effect is at the limit of the medium value r = 0.35). On average, teachers also agree more with the fact that the material available so far (written and multimedia) is already sufficient for an in-depth study of SN students at TIT (the strength of the effect is medium r = 0.44). Therefore, teachers are less likely to agree that they need more training for teaching SN children (the effect strength is medium). When assessing the functionality of information and communication technology (hereafter ICT), we also detect statistically significant differences. We found several statistically significant differences in the group of students with autism. Teachers and parents find YouTube videos, movies, robotics learning environments, e-mail, Wikipedia, 3D modeling, and coding/programming functional or moderately functional, while future teachers do not deem them functional (the strength of the effect is strong). With the master's thesis, we want to influence the field of inclusion of selected groups of SN students in TIT lessons. The resulting master's thesis can be a good starting point for further research in this field, and it can also be a good basis for the renewal of the curriculum of the TIT course, in terms of including selected groups of SN students.

Keywords:Grading, lesson adjustments, comparative analysis, design and technology, pupils with special educational needs.

Similar documents

Similar works from RUL:
Similar works from other Slovenian collections:

Back