Primernost traktorskih vlak za vožnjo z zgibnim polprikoličarjem : diplomsko delo (visokošolski strokovni študij)

Žlogar, Jure (author), Košir, Boštjan (mentor)

Meritve za diplomsko delo so potekale na KE Cerknica, v GGE Škocjan-Unec. Na tem območju je v letih 2004, 2005 in 2006 prvič potekala strojna sečnja in spravilo. Namen naloge je bil pridobiti podatke posledic na spravilnih poteh in ob njih, pri vožnji in vlačenju, obe tehnologiji med seboj primerjati in ugotoviti kolikšen del traktorskih vlak je primeren za delo z zgibnim polprikoličarjem oz. koliko spravilnih poti potrebujemo pri strojnem spravilu.Za vožnjo z zgibnim polprikoličarjem ni bilo primernih le 3 % traktorskih vlak, tehnologija strojne sečnje pa je potrebovala 61 % več spravilnih poti kot tehnologija traktorskega spravila. Pri traktorskem spravilu je vpliv na tla v raziskovalnem območju neškodljiv, pri strojnem spravilu pa zmeren. Število poškodb pri traktorskem spravilu je manjše kot pristrojnem spravilu, vendar potrebujemo pri slednjem tudi večjo dolžino spravilnih poti. Primerjali smo traktorsko vlačenje z vožnjo z zgibnim polprikoličarjem. Za primerjavo obeh tehnologij v celoti, pa nam manjkajo podatki o privlačevanju pri traktorskem spravilu.

• Language: Slovenian
• Keywords: spravilo lesa, zgibni polprikoličar, traktor, prehodnost terena, poškodbe terena
• Work type: Undergraduate thesis
• Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
• Organization: BF - Biotechnical Faculty
• Place of publishing: Ljubljana
• Publisher: [J. Žlogar]
• Year: 2007
• Number of pages: X, 57 f.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-15485
• UDC: 630*37(043.2)=163.6
• COBISS.SI-ID: 2120102
• Publication date in RUL: 11.07.2014

Secondary language

• Language: English

Abstract

The measurements for this graduation thesis were taken at KE Cerknica, in GGE UnecŠkocjan. The first mechanized cutting down and skidding wood took place in2004, 2005 and 2006. Our goal was to gather information about the characteristics and damage shown on and around the skid roads. We compared thedamage caused by forwarding and skidding and tried to figure out how many tractor skid roads were suitable for working with forwarder and how many skid roads are actually required for CTL method. Only 3 % of tractor skid roads were not suitable for forwarding, however CTL-technology required 61 % more skid roads than technology using tractors. Working with tractors has no negative effects on the ground soil within our measuring site and mechanized skidding has a moderate visible soil damages ill. There are fewer injuries caused by tractor than forwarding which also requires a longer range of skid roads. We compared tractor skidding and forwarding. However we lack the data on tractor bunching for overall comparison of both technologies.